← Mathematical compendium
Published equation contexts
10−15
Why this formula appears here
Lay all of it out in one table, rows for experiments and columns for the five components, and four columns get real entries: ηcl constrained at the 10^{-15} level by MICROSCOPE, η^diag constrained by every dual-species and clock test in the list, η^coh constrained at the low- 10^{-9} level by Rosi and colleagues’ internal-superposition test, η^sup constrained by Overstreet and colleagues’ gravitational Aharonov-Bohm result. The fifth column, η^ent , has nothing in it — not a weak bound, not a preliminary number, nothing. The paper’s proposition on this point is not merely that the entangled component happens to be unmeasured; it proves, within its…
Read the full article-specific guide →
How to interpret it
Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.
Research cited beside this formula
Published contexts (2)
A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.
Equation 23 · Quantum Relativity
This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text.
Lay all of it out in one table, rows for experiments and columns for the five components, and four columns get real entries: ηcl constrained at the 10^{-15} level by MICROSCOPE, η^diag constrained by every dual-species and clock test in the list, η^coh constrained at the low- 10^{-9} level by Rosi and colleagues’ internal-superposition test, η^sup constrained by Overstreet and colleagues’ gravitational Aharonov-Bohm result. The fifth column, η^ent , has nothing in it — not a weak bound, not a preliminary number, nothing. The paper’s proposition on this point is not merely that the entangled component happens to be unmeasured; it proves, within its…
Equation guide → ·
Article →Equation 5 · Technological Evolution
This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text.
Measured against that floor, today’s mainstream logic is nowhere close, and the gap is large enough to state with confidence even given the uncertainty in any single measurement. The IRDS’s own 2023 logic-device electrical specifications table projects energy per switching event for a high-density logic cell at roughly 0.86 femtojoules in 2023, declining only to roughly 0.4 femtojoules by its 2037 projection even after the roadmap’s full projected run of gate-all-around and CFET architecture transitions [ 4 ] . A femtojoule is 10^{-15} joules; the Landauer bound at 300 kelvin is roughly 2.9×10^{-21} joules. Even the roadmap’s best-case 2037 projection is therefore still more than five…
Equation guide → ·
Article →