← Back to article

Equation 10 · What Interpretability Actually Costs to Do at Scale

What does this equation mean?

2dn2dn

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

dd

Symbol d

d is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.

Understand this part →

nn

Symbol n

n is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.

Understand this part →

How to interpret it

Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

What the article says around this equation

Work out what that architecture actually spends compute on per token, because the two halves of it behave differently. The encoding step needs a score for every one of the n candidate latents before it can select the top k , so it is an unavoidably dense matrix multiply: roughly 2dn floating-point operations. The decoding step only touches the k latents that survived, so it is sparse: roughly 2dk operations. Summed and multiplied across T training tokens, a first-order compute model for training the dictionary is

Read the equation in its article →

Sources cited in the article section

These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.

Return to What Interpretability Actually Costs to Do at Scale

See this formula across 1 published context →

Browse the mathematical compendium →