Equation 3 · The Frontier Model Landscape in 2035: Four Scenarios, Their Signals, and What Would Falsify Them
What does this equation mean?
Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.
This equation gives an approximation: it relates the quantities while allowing an approximation. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.
Read it piece by piece
Symbol C_train
rain is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.
Symbol t
t is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.
Symbol C_0
is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.
Symbol g^t-t_0
- is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.
subtraction
Subtract the following term or group from the preceding one. A leading minus marks a negative quantity.
subscript
The lower label selects a particular version, component, or indexed member of the quantity. For example, x₀ and xₜ can be values at different positions.
superscript
A raised number can be a power. When it is a label or bound, it selects a case or the upper limit of a sum; the formula’s structure distinguishes these uses.
See an illustrated explanation →How to interpret it
Its accuracy depends on the assumptions and range of use described in the article.
What the article says around this equation
Write for the cost of the largest training run in year t . Epoch’s estimate is well approximated by simple exponential growth, . with g between roughly two-point-four and three-point-five depending on method and window [ 5 , 6 ] . The form matters more than the exact rate: exponential cost growth does not by itself predict consolidation. It predicts a shrinking count of organisations able to clear an ever-rising bar only if the pool of adequately capitalised entrants grows more slowly than . Whether that pool keeps pace is a question about capital markets and state investment, not something the cost curve alone answers — which is exactly why axis…
Read the full surrounding passage
Write for the cost of the largest training run in year t . Epoch’s estimate is well approximated by simple exponential growth, . with g between roughly two-point-four and three-point-five depending on method and window [ 5 , 6 ] . The form matters more than the exact rate: exponential cost growth does not by itself predict consolidation. It predicts a shrinking count of organisations able to clear an ever-rising bar only if the pool of adequately capitalised entrants grows more slowly than . Whether that pool keeps pace is a question about capital markets and state investment, not something the cost curve alone answers — which is exactly why axis A stays open below rather than settled by this one fact.
Sources cited in the article section
- [8] 2025: The State of Generative AI in the Enterprise ↗
- [12] Anthropic Overtakes OpenAI in B2B Adoption for the First Time, According to Ramp Spending Data ↗
- [5] The Rising Costs of Training Frontier AI Models ↗
- [6] Key Trends and Figures in Machine Learning ↗
- [7] FTC Staff Report on AI Partnerships & Investments 6(b) Study (Partnerships Between Cloud Service Providers and AI Developers) ↗
These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.