← Back to article

Equation 120 · The Clock That Comes Back Wrong by Exactly Its Mass

What does this equation mean?

ϕ≈keff g T2\phi\approx k_{\rm eff}\,g\,T^2

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

This equation gives an approximation: it relates the quantities while allowing an approximation. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

ϕ\phi

Symbol phi

phi is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.

Understand this part →

keffk_{\rm eff}

Symbol k_rm eff

krk_rm eff is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.

Understand this part →

gg

Symbol g

g is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.

Understand this part →

T2T^2

Symbol T^2

The square of T: multiply T by itself.

Understand this part →

≈

≈

Approximately equal to; the equality is not exact.

Understand this part →

subscript

subscript

The lower label selects a particular version, component, or indexed member of the quantity. For example, x₀ and xₜ can be values at different positions.

Understand this part →

superscript

superscript

A raised number can be a power. When it is a label or bound, it selects a case or the upper limit of a sum; the formula’s structure distinguishes these uses.

Understand this part →

See an illustrated explanation →

How to interpret it

Its accuracy depends on the assumptions and range of use described in the article.

What the article says around this equation

Here is the strongest objection this construction has to survive, and it is not hypothetical — it was argued in print for over a decade. In 2010, Müller, Peters, and Chu proposed that an ordinary light-pulse atom interferometer’s gravimeter phase already constitutes a measurement of the gravitational redshift at the atom’s Compton frequency mc2c^2/ℏ\hbar , reading the standard interferometer as an implicit realization of exactly the proper-time phase this paper formalizes [ 6 ] . Wolf, Blanchet, Bordé, Reynaud, Salomon, and Cohen-Tannoudji objected immediately: the standard three-pulse Mach–Zehnder gravimeter phase, computed by the ordinary classical-action method, is ϕ\phi≈\approx k_{\rm…
Read the full surrounding passage
Here is the strongest objection this construction has to survive, and it is not hypothetical — it was argued in print for over a decade. In 2010, Müller, Peters, and Chu proposed that an ordinary light-pulse atom interferometer’s gravimeter phase already constitutes a measurement of the gravitational redshift at the atom’s Compton frequency mc2c^2/ℏ\hbar , reading the standard interferometer as an implicit realization of exactly the proper-time phase this paper formalizes [ 6 ] . Wolf, Blanchet, Bordé, Reynaud, Salomon, and Cohen-Tannoudji objected immediately: the standard three-pulse Mach–Zehnder gravimeter phase, computed by the ordinary classical-action method, is ϕ\phi≈\approx keffk_{\rm eff}\,g\,T2T^2 , a quantity built entirely from the laser wavevector, gravitational acceleration, and pulse timing, with no dependence on the atom’s mass at all [ 7 ] . Sinha and Samuel sharpened the point into a slogan worth taking literally: an atom in this configuration is not a clock ticking at the Compton frequency, because nothing in the standard phase formula reads out that frequency [ 8 ] .

Read the equation in its article →

Sources cited in the surrounding passage

These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.

Return to The Clock That Comes Back Wrong by Exactly Its Mass

See this formula across 1 published context →

Browse the mathematical compendium →