Equation 2 · Hominin Evolution and Deep Prehistory: A First-Principles Introduction
What does this equation mean?
Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.
This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.
Read it piece by piece
Symbol hatf
hatf is part of the quantity the equation computes from the expression on the right.
Symbol i
i appears in the bound of this sum. The bound states where the repeated operation starts, ends, or which values it includes.
Symbol P_2
occurs above the fraction bar. The numerator is divided by the entire denominator below it.
Symbol P_1
is one of the signed contributions combined to compute the quantity on the left.
Symbol P_4
is one of the signed contributions combined to compute the quantity on the left.
Symbol P_3
occurs below the fraction bar. The quantity above the bar is divided by this expression; zero is excluded as a denominator.
=
The expressions on both sides represent the same quantity under the stated assumptions.
See an illustrated explanation →subtraction
Subtract the following term or group from the preceding one. A leading minus marks a negative quantity.
subscript
The lower label selects a particular version, component, or indexed member of the quantity. For example, x₀ and xₜ can be values at different positions.
Numerator: sum_i (P_2(i) - P_1(i))(P_4(i) - P_1(i))
The complete quantity above the fraction bar.
See an illustrated explanation →Denominator: sum_i (P_3(i) - P_1(i))(P_4(i) - P_1(i))
The complete quantity below the fraction bar; it must be nonzero for this division.
See an illustrated explanation →Starting index or lower bound: i
This label says where the repeated addition, multiplication, or accumulation starts. Read its value or condition together with the article’s description of the index.
Starting index or lower bound: i
This label says where the repeated addition, multiplication, or accumulation starts. Read its value or condition together with the article’s description of the index.
How to interpret it
With a fixed numerator, increasing a nonzero denominator reduces the fraction. Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.
What the article says around this equation
The basic tool for estimating what fraction of a genome derives from an archaic population is comparative allele sharing: for a given modern population, count how much more genetic variation it shares with an archaic genome than a population known to lack that admixture does, and scale by how much variation the archaic and comparison genomes share with each other overall. A simplified version of the widely used D -statistic framework expresses this as: . where through are allele frequencies at site i in an outgroup, a candidate-admixed population, a comparison population without the admixture, and the archaic source, respectively. The estimator exploits a simple…
Read the full surrounding passage
The basic tool for estimating what fraction of a genome derives from an archaic population is comparative allele sharing: for a given modern population, count how much more genetic variation it shares with an archaic genome than a population known to lack that admixture does, and scale by how much variation the archaic and comparison genomes share with each other overall. A simplified version of the widely used D -statistic framework expresses this as: . where through are allele frequencies at site i in an outgroup, a candidate-admixed population, a comparison population without the admixture, and the archaic source, respectively. The estimator exploits a simple logic: if population has interbred with the archaic lineage and has not, should share systematically more rare variants with than does, in proportion to the fraction of its genome that traces to that admixture event. This is why admixture claims in the literature are reported as percentages with confidence intervals rather than as a binary yes/no — the estimate is statistical, built from many thousands of sites, not read off a single marker.
Sources cited in the article section
- [1] A Draft Sequence of the Neandertal Genome ↗
- [2] Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia ↗
- [7] Ancient Genomics of Modern Humans: The First Decade ↗
These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.
Return to Hominin Evolution and Deep Prehistory: A First-Principles Introduction