← Back to article

Equation 104 · The Entry a Relabeling Cannot Write

What does this equation mean?

t∗=π/(2g)=1/(4×10 MHz)=25.0 nst^\ast = \pi/(2g) = 1/(4\times10\ \mathrm{MHz}) = 25.0\ \mathrm{ns}

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

Inputs and operationspi/(2g) = 1/(4 × 10 MHz) = 25.0 ns
Result or conditiont^ast
How to read the two sides of this formula. Follow the article passage for the meaning of each quantity.

This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

t∗t^\ast

Symbol t^ast

tat^ast is part of the quantity the equation computes from the expression on the right.

Understand this part →

π\pi

Symbol pi

pi is an input to the expression that computes the quantity on the left.

Understand this part →

gg

Symbol g

g is an input to the expression that computes the quantity on the left.

Understand this part →

=

=

The expressions on both sides represent the same quantity under the stated assumptions.

Understand this part →

See an illustrated explanation →

How to interpret it

Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

What the article says around this equation

Putting numbers to the swing keeps it honest rather than decorative. Take ω\omega/2π\pi = 5\ GHz\mathrm{GHz} and g/2π\pi = 10\ MHz\mathrm{MHz} , both squarely inside the range of qubit and resonator frequencies and coupling strengths reported across circuit quantum electrodynamics architectures, which span a few gigahertz in frequency and from a fraction of a megahertz up to several hundred megahertz in coupling depending on the regime [ 12 ] . The swap time is t∗t^\ast = π\pi/(2g) = 1/(4×\times10\ MHz\mathrm{MHz}) = 25.0\ ns\mathrm{ns} , and the ledger’s swing at that instant is ℏ\hbarω\omega/2 ≈\approx 1.66×\times10^{-24}\ J\mathrm{J} ≈\approx 10.3\ μ\mueV\mathrm{eV} — an exact analytic evaluation under the stated…
Read the full surrounding passage
Putting numbers to the swing keeps it honest rather than decorative. Take ω\omega/2π\pi = 5\ GHz\mathrm{GHz} and g/2π\pi = 10\ MHz\mathrm{MHz} , both squarely inside the range of qubit and resonator frequencies and coupling strengths reported across circuit quantum electrodynamics architectures, which span a few gigahertz in frequency and from a fraction of a megahertz up to several hundred megahertz in coupling depending on the regime [ 12 ] . The swap time is t∗t^\ast = π\pi/(2g) = 1/(4×\times10\ MHz\mathrm{MHz}) = 25.0\ ns\mathrm{ns} , and the ledger’s swing at that instant is ℏ\hbarω\omega/2 ≈\approx 1.66×\times10^{-24}\ J\mathrm{J} ≈\approx 10.3\ μ\mueV\mathrm{eV} — an exact analytic evaluation under the stated resonance and coupling assumptions, reported here as illustrative of the ledger’s scale, not as a claim that this exact swing has been measured in any specific run.

Read the equation in its article →

Sources cited in the surrounding passage

These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.

Return to The Entry a Relabeling Cannot Write

See this formula across 1 published context →

Browse the mathematical compendium →