← Back to article

Equation 1 · Attribution: Tying One Event to a Changing Climate

What does this equation mean?

PR=p1p0,FAR=1−p0p1=1−1PR.\mathrm{PR} = \frac{p_1}{p_0}, \qquad \mathrm{FAR} = 1 - \frac{p_0}{p_1} = 1 - \frac{1}{\mathrm{PR}}.

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

Start withp_1
Divide byp_0
This relates toPR
How to read the two sides of this formula. Follow the article passage for the meaning of each quantity.

This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

p1p_1

Symbol p_1

p1p_1 is one of the signed contributions combined to compute the quantity on the left.

Understand this part →

p0p_0

Symbol p_0

p0p_0 is one of the signed contributions combined to compute the quantity on the left.

Understand this part →

=

=

The expressions on both sides represent the same quantity under the stated assumptions.

Understand this part →

See an illustrated explanation →
fraction

fraction

Divide the expression above the line by the one below it.

Understand this part →

See an illustrated explanation →
subtraction

subtraction

Subtract the following term or group from the preceding one. A leading minus marks a negative quantity.

Understand this part →

subscript

subscript

The lower label selects a particular version, component, or indexed member of the quantity. For example, x₀ and xₜ can be values at different positions.

Understand this part →

11

Numerator: 1

The complete quantity above the fraction bar.

Understand this part →

PR\mathrm{PR}

Denominator: PR

The complete quantity below the fraction bar; it must be nonzero for this division.

Understand this part →

How to interpret it

With a fixed numerator, increasing a nonzero denominator reduces the fraction. Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

What the article says around this equation

The standard output is a probability ratio, also called a risk ratio, comparing the annual probability of the event in the factual climate with its probability in the counterfactual one [ 3 ] . Writing those probabilities as the factual and counterfactual annual exceedance probabilities, PR=p1p0,FAR=1−p0p1=1−1PR\mathrm{PR} = \frac{p_1}{p_0}, \qquad \mathrm{FAR} = 1 - \frac{p_0}{p_1} = 1 - \frac{1}{\mathrm{PR}}. The fraction of attributable risk is a monotone transform of the ratio and contains no additional information. Its name invites a misreading that the field has warned about for two decades: it is not the probability that this event was caused by forcing, and it does not license the statement that a given fraction of the damage was anthropogenic in any individual case. It is a…
Read the full surrounding passage
The standard output is a probability ratio, also called a risk ratio, comparing the annual probability of the event in the factual climate with its probability in the counterfactual one [ 3 ] . Writing those probabilities as the factual and counterfactual annual exceedance probabilities, PR=p1p0,FAR=1−p0p1=1−1PR\mathrm{PR} = \frac{p_1}{p_0}, \qquad \mathrm{FAR} = 1 - \frac{p_0}{p_1} = 1 - \frac{1}{\mathrm{PR}}. The fraction of attributable risk is a monotone transform of the ratio and contains no additional information. Its name invites a misreading that the field has warned about for two decades: it is not the probability that this event was caused by forcing, and it does not license the statement that a given fraction of the damage was anthropogenic in any individual case. It is a population-level quantity, and Lloyd and Shepherd’s central methodological point is that population-level attributions do not transfer to singular events without further argument [ 6 ] .

Read the equation in its article →

Sources cited in the surrounding passage

These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.

Return to Attribution: Tying One Event to a Changing Climate

See this formula across 1 published context →

Browse the mathematical compendium →