← Mathematical compendium

Published equation contexts

y=f(x1,x2,…,xN)y = f(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_N)

Why this formula appears here

The GUM’s central move is to treat every measured or estimated quantity a result depends on as a random variable with its own estimated standard uncertainty, and then to propagate those uncertainties through the mathematical relationship that produces the final result. If a measurement result y is a function of N input quantities, y = f(x1x_1, x2x_2, …\ldots, xNx_N) , the combined standard uncertainty is obtained from a first-order Taylor expansion of that function:

Read the full article-specific guide →

Read the representative guide

How to interpret it

Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

Research cited beside this formula

Published contexts (2)

A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.

y=f(x1,x2,…,xN)y = f(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_N)

Equation 3 · Scientific Methods

How Scientific Instruments and Metrology Actually Work

This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions.

The GUM’s central move is to treat every measured or estimated quantity a result depends on as a random variable with its own estimated standard uncertainty, and then to propagate those uncertainties through the mathematical relationship that produces the final result. If a measurement result y is a function of N input quantities, y = f(x1x_1, x2x_2, …\ldots, xNx_N) , the combined standard uncertainty is obtained from a first-order Taylor expansion of that function:

Meanings in this article

  • yy: the if a measurement result.
Equation guide → · Article →
y=f(x1,x2,…,xN)y = f(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_N)

Equation 3 · Scientific Methods

Comparing the Main Approaches to Scientific Instruments and Metrology

This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions.

Uncertainty itself has a standard grammar, laid out in the GUM and adopted domestically by NIST in Technical Note 1297. Every source of doubt about a measured value is classified as either a Type A evaluation — estimated from the statistical scatter of repeated observations — or a Type B evaluation — estimated from any other information, such as a calibration certificate, a manufacturer’s specification, or physical reasoning about a known systematic effect [ 2 ] [ 3 ] . These component uncertainties are combined, following an explicit propagation rule, into a combined standard uncertainty, which is then multiplied by a coverage factor (conventionally k=2 , corresponding loosely to a 95%…

Equation guide → · Article →