Published equation contexts
Why this formula appears here
Magdalena Zych and Časlav Brukner’s 2018 paper supplies the anchor the new work builds directly on top of: a classical body’s equivalence principle, they argue, says nothing at all about whether the quantum version holds, because a quantum system’s mass is not one number but an operator, and equivalence has to be stated as equivalence between its rest, inertial, and gravitational internal-energy operators rather than between their average values [ 1 ] . Model that operator, call it , as = m(1 + /m) , where is the system’s internal Hamiltonian, and let the gravitational mass be = for some violation operator acting on the…
Read the representative guide
Symbol m
m is one of the signed contributions combined to compute the quantity on the left.
Read this term in its guide →Symbol hat H_int
hat nt is one of the signed contributions combined to compute the quantity on the left.
Read this term in its guide →How to interpret it
Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.
Research cited beside this formula
Published contexts (1)
A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.
Equation 3 · Quantum Relativity
The Corner of the Equivalence Principle No Experiment Has Touched
This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions.
Magdalena Zych and Časlav Brukner’s 2018 paper supplies the anchor the new work builds directly on top of: a classical body’s equivalence principle, they argue, says nothing at all about whether the quantum version holds, because a quantum system’s mass is not one number but an operator, and equivalence has to be stated as equivalence between its rest, inertial, and gravitational internal-energy operators rather than between their average values [ 1 ] . Model that operator, call it , as = m(1 + /m) , where is the system’s internal Hamiltonian, and let the gravitational mass be = for some violation operator acting on the…