← Mathematical compendium

Published equation contexts

compute(t)bandwidth(t)  =  compute(0)bandwidth(0)⋅(3.01.6)t/2\frac{\text{compute}(t)}{\text{bandwidth}(t)} \;=\; \frac{\text{compute}(0)}{\text{bandwidth}(0)} \cdot \left(\frac{3.0}{1.6}\right)^{t/2}

Why this formula appears here

The scale of that abstract argument, made concrete decades later, is stark. Gholami and colleagues, surveying twenty years of server hardware, report that peak hardware FLOPS scaled at roughly 3.0 times every two years while DRAM bandwidth scaled at only 1.6 times and interconnect bandwidth at 1.4 times over the same interval [ 13 ] . Those are compounding rates, and compounding rates diverge violently over long periods. If the two multipliers applied uniformly across a full twenty years — an extrapolation the source itself does not perform, offered here only to size the shape of the problem, not as a number the cited paper states — the ratio between available arithmetic and available…

Read the full article-specific guide →

Read the representative guide

bandwidth(t)\text{bandwidth}(t)

Denominator: bandwidth(t)

The complete quantity below the fraction bar; it must be nonzero for this division.

Read this term in its guide →
bandwidth(0)\text{bandwidth}(0)

Denominator: bandwidth(0)

The complete quantity below the fraction bar; it must be nonzero for this division.

Read this term in its guide →

How to interpret it

With a fixed numerator, increasing a nonzero denominator reduces the fraction. Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

Research cited beside this formula

Published contexts (1)

A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.

compute(t)bandwidth(t)  =  compute(0)bandwidth(0)⋅(3.01.6)t/2,\frac{\text{compute}(t)}{\text{bandwidth}(t)} \;=\; \frac{\text{compute}(0)}{\text{bandwidth}(0)} \cdot \left(\frac{3.0}{1.6}\right)^{t/2},

Equation 1 · Semiconductors

From Origins to Frontier: A History of AI Memory Systems and the Bandwidth Wall

This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions.

The scale of that abstract argument, made concrete decades later, is stark. Gholami and colleagues, surveying twenty years of server hardware, report that peak hardware FLOPS scaled at roughly 3.0 times every two years while DRAM bandwidth scaled at only 1.6 times and interconnect bandwidth at 1.4 times over the same interval [ 13 ] . Those are compounding rates, and compounding rates diverge violently over long periods. If the two multipliers applied uniformly across a full twenty years — an extrapolation the source itself does not perform, offered here only to size the shape of the problem, not as a number the cited paper states — the ratio between available arithmetic and available…

Equation guide → · Article →