Published equation contexts
Why this formula appears here
A finished, fully-processed 300-millimeter wafer at an advanced node carries somewhere in the neighborhood of several hundred to a few thousand individual dies, and not all of them will work. The simplest model process engineers reach for treats random defects as a Poisson process across the wafer: given an average defect density (critical defects per unit area) and a die’s critical area (the area within which a defect is actually fatal to that die’s function), the expected fraction of working die is . This Poisson form is known to be pessimistic in practice, because real defects cluster rather than distributing independently across the wafer — a…
Read the representative guide
Symbol e^-A_c D_0
is one of the signed contributions combined to compute the quantity on the left.
Read this term in its guide →How to interpret it
Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.
Research cited beside this formula
Published contexts (1)
A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.
Equation 4 · Semiconductors
Advanced Semiconductor Fabrication in Practice: An Advanced Technical Guide
This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions.
A finished, fully-processed 300-millimeter wafer at an advanced node carries somewhere in the neighborhood of several hundred to a few thousand individual dies, and not all of them will work. The simplest model process engineers reach for treats random defects as a Poisson process across the wafer: given an average defect density (critical defects per unit area) and a die’s critical area (the area within which a defect is actually fatal to that die’s function), the expected fraction of working die is . This Poisson form is known to be pessimistic in practice, because real defects cluster rather than distributing independently across the wafer — a…