← Mathematical compendium

Published equation contexts

S=2.42±0.20S = 2.42 \pm 0.20

Why this formula appears here

2015 closed both, three times over. Hensen and colleagues at Delft entangled electron spins in diamond, 1.3 kilometres apart, and measured S = 2.42 ±\pm 0.20 against the bound of 2, with detection efficient enough and separation wide enough to close both loopholes together [ 4 ] . Giustina and colleagues in Vienna, using entangled photons and high-efficiency detectors, reported a violation whose probability under local realism was no greater than 3.74 ×\times 10^{-31} [ 5 ] ; Shalm and colleagues at NIST, independently, reported p-values as low as 5.9 ×\times 10^{-9} [ 6 ] . Between the three, no known loophole remained.

Read the full article-specific guide →

Read the representative guide

How to interpret it

Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

Research cited beside this formula

Published contexts (1)

A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.

S=2.42±0.20S = 2.42 \pm 0.20

Equation 4 · Einstein & Evolution

God Plays Dice, and Evolution Loads Them

This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions.

2015 closed both, three times over. Hensen and colleagues at Delft entangled electron spins in diamond, 1.3 kilometres apart, and measured S = 2.42 ±\pm 0.20 against the bound of 2, with detection efficient enough and separation wide enough to close both loopholes together [ 4 ] . Giustina and colleagues in Vienna, using entangled photons and high-efficiency detectors, reported a violation whose probability under local realism was no greater than 3.74 ×\times 10^{-31} [ 5 ] ; Shalm and colleagues at NIST, independently, reported p-values as low as 5.9 ×\times 10^{-9} [ 6 ] . Between the three, no known loophole remained.

Equation guide → · Article →