← Mathematical compendium

Published equation contexts

N(t)≈N0⋅2(t−t0)/TN(t) \approx N_0 \cdot 2^{(t - t_0)/T}

Why this formula appears here

The two numbers are worth writing down side by side, because the difference between them is itself a historical fact rather than a rounding error. If N0N_0 is the component count at a reference time t0t_0 , the extrapolation in each case took the form N(t)≈N0⋅2(t−t0)/TN(t) \approx N_0 \cdot 2^{(t - t_0)/T}. with T ≈\approx 1 year in the 1965 paper’s implied rate and T ≈\approx 2 years in Moore’s own 1975 revision [ 1 , 2 ] . A model that halves its own rate parameter after a decade of data is not a law of nature; it is a working forecast that its author corrected in public once, using new evidence, at a named conference. That the popular shorthand later collapsed both versions into a single unchanging “law” says more about the…

Read the full article-specific guide →

Read the representative guide

NN

Symbol N

N is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.

Read this term in its guide →
tt

Symbol t

t is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.

Read this term in its guide →
N0N_0

Symbol N_0

the component count at a reference time t0t_0 , the extrapolation in each case took the form [displayed formula].

Read this term in its guide →
t0t_0

Symbol t_0

t0t_0 is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.

Read this term in its guide →
TT

Symbol T

T is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.

Read this term in its guide →

How to interpret it

Its accuracy depends on the assumptions and range of use described in the article.

Research cited beside this formula

Published contexts (1)

A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.

N(t)≈N0⋅2(t−t0)/T,N(t) \approx N_0 \cdot 2^{(t - t_0)/T},

Equation 3 · Semiconductors

From Origins to Frontier: A History of Advanced Semiconductor Fabrication

This equation gives an approximation: it relates the quantities while allowing an approximation.

The two numbers are worth writing down side by side, because the difference between them is itself a historical fact rather than a rounding error. If N0N_0 is the component count at a reference time t0t_0 , the extrapolation in each case took the form N(t)≈N0⋅2(t−t0)/TN(t) \approx N_0 \cdot 2^{(t - t_0)/T}. with T ≈\approx 1 year in the 1965 paper’s implied rate and T ≈\approx 2 years in Moore’s own 1975 revision [ 1 , 2 ] . A model that halves its own rate parameter after a decade of data is not a law of nature; it is a working forecast that its author corrected in public once, using new evidence, at a named conference. That the popular shorthand later collapsed both versions into a single unchanging “law” says more about the…

Meanings in this article

  • N0N_0: the component count at a reference time t0t_0 , the extrapolation in each case took the form [displayed formula].
Equation guide → · Article →