Symbol N
N is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.
Read this term in its guide →Published equation contexts
The two numbers are worth writing down side by side, because the difference between them is itself a historical fact rather than a rounding error. If is the component count at a reference time , the extrapolation in each case took the form . with T 1 year in the 1965 paper’s implied rate and T 2 years in Moore’s own 1975 revision [ 1 , 2 ] . A model that halves its own rate parameter after a decade of data is not a law of nature; it is a working forecast that its author corrected in public once, using new evidence, at a named conference. That the popular shorthand later collapsed both versions into a single unchanging “law” says more about the…
N is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.
Read this term in its guide →t is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.
Read this term in its guide →the component count at a reference time , the extrapolation in each case took the form [displayed formula].
Read this term in its guide →is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.
Read this term in its guide →T is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.
Read this term in its guide →Its accuracy depends on the assumptions and range of use described in the article.
A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.
Equation 3 · Semiconductors
This equation gives an approximation: it relates the quantities while allowing an approximation.
The two numbers are worth writing down side by side, because the difference between them is itself a historical fact rather than a rounding error. If is the component count at a reference time , the extrapolation in each case took the form . with T 1 year in the 1965 paper’s implied rate and T 2 years in Moore’s own 1975 revision [ 1 , 2 ] . A model that halves its own rate parameter after a decade of data is not a law of nature; it is a working forecast that its author corrected in public once, using new evidence, at a named conference. That the popular shorthand later collapsed both versions into a single unchanging “law” says more about the…