← Back to article

Equation 27 · Why Materials Fail: Fracture, Flaws and the Inspection Interval

What does this equation mean?

Ps=exp⁡[−V(σσ0)m],P_s = \exp\left[-V\left(\frac{\sigma}{\sigma_0}\right)^{m}\right],

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

Start withσ
Divide bysigma_0
This relates toP_s
How to read the two sides of this formula. Follow the article passage for the meaning of each quantity.

This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

PsP_s

Symbol P_s

PsP_s is part of the quantity the equation computes from the expression on the right.

Understand this part →

VV

Symbol V

V is one of the signed contributions combined to compute the quantity on the left.

Understand this part →

σ\sigma

Symbol σ

σ is one of the signed contributions combined to compute the quantity on the left.

Understand this part →

σ0\sigma_0

Symbol sigma_0

the scale parameter.

Understand this part →

mm

Symbol m

m is one of the signed contributions combined to compute the quantity on the left.

Understand this part →

=

=

The expressions on both sides represent the same quantity under the stated assumptions.

Understand this part →

See an illustrated explanation →
fraction

fraction

Divide the expression above the line by the one below it.

Understand this part →

See an illustrated explanation →
subscript

subscript

The lower label selects a particular version, component, or indexed member of the quantity. For example, x₀ and xₜ can be values at different positions.

Understand this part →

superscript

superscript

A raised number can be a power. When it is a label or bound, it selects a case or the upper limit of a sum; the formula’s structure distinguishes these uses.

Understand this part →

See an illustrated explanation →

How to interpret it

With a fixed numerator, increasing a nonzero denominator reduces the fraction. Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

What the article says around this equation

If the strength of a brittle body is set by its largest flaw, and flaw populations are random, then strength is a random variable and reporting a mean is an error of category. The standard treatment is the Weibull weakest-link model, in which the probability that a body of volume V survives a uniform stress σ\sigma is Ps=exp⁡[−V(σσ0)m]P_s = \exp\left[-V\left(\frac{\sigma}{\sigma_0}\right)^{m}\right]. with m the Weibull modulus and σ0\sigma_0 a scale parameter. A larger m means tighter scatter. A review of Weibull analysis across ceramics reports moduli of roughly 10 or below for many advanced ceramics such as alumina, hydroxyapatite and silicon carbide, below about 7 for the glass-ceramics and zirconias surveyed, and above 40 for one magnesium-based glass,…
Read the full surrounding passage
If the strength of a brittle body is set by its largest flaw, and flaw populations are random, then strength is a random variable and reporting a mean is an error of category. The standard treatment is the Weibull weakest-link model, in which the probability that a body of volume V survives a uniform stress σ\sigma is Ps=exp⁡[−V(σσ0)m]P_s = \exp\left[-V\left(\frac{\sigma}{\sigma_0}\right)^{m}\right]. with m the Weibull modulus and σ0\sigma_0 a scale parameter. A larger m means tighter scatter. A review of Weibull analysis across ceramics reports moduli of roughly 10 or below for many advanced ceramics such as alumina, hydroxyapatite and silicon carbide, below about 7 for the glass-ceramics and zirconias surveyed, and above 40 for one magnesium-based glass, while emphasising that reliable modulus estimates need substantial sample sizes [ 11 ] .

Read the equation in its article →

Sources cited in the surrounding passage

These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.

Return to Why Materials Fail: Fracture, Flaws and the Inspection Interval

See this formula across 1 published context →

Browse the mathematical compendium →