Equation 3 · What the Machine Breakers Actually Wanted
What does this equation mean?
Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.
This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.
Read it piece by piece
Symbol Y
Y is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.
Symbol L
L is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.
How to interpret it
Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.
What the article says around this equation
where w is the real wage, Y/L output per worker, and labour’s share of value added. Productivity growth is necessary for durable wage growth but not sufficient for it: the second term can absorb the first for decades. Allen’s contribution is to show that in Britain it did.
Sources cited in the article section
- [7] Pessimism Perpetuated: Real Wages and the Standard of Living in Britain during and after the Industrial Revolution ↗
- [8] Engels' pause: Technical change, capital accumulation, and inequality in the British industrial revolution ↗
- [9] The History of Technological Anxiety and the Future of Economic Growth: Is This Time Different? ↗
These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.
Return to What the Machine Breakers Actually Wanted