Equation 11 · What Interpretability Actually Costs to Do at Scale
What does this equation mean?
Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.
the because published topk configurations keep. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.
Read it piece by piece
How to interpret it
Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.
What the article says around this equation
Work out what that architecture actually spends compute on per token, because the two halves of it behave differently. The encoding step needs a score for every one of the n candidate latents before it can select the top k , so it is an unavoidably dense matrix multiply: roughly 2dn floating-point operations. The decoding step only touches the k latents that survived, so it is sparse: roughly 2dk operations. Summed and multiplied across T training tokens, a first-order compute model for training the dictionary is
Sources cited in the article section
These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.
Return to What Interpretability Actually Costs to Do at Scale