← Back to article

Equation 39 · Shrink It, Train It Small, or Search for It: The Main Strategies for Small Models, Compared

What does this equation mean?

Mresident≤BmemM_{\text{resident}} \le B_{\text{mem}}

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

This equation states a bound: one expression must stay on the indicated side of the other under the article’s assumptions. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

MresidentM_{\text{resident}}

Symbol M_resident

MrM_resident is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.

Understand this part →

BmemB_{\text{mem}}

Symbol B_mem

BmB_mem is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.

Understand this part →

subscript

subscript

The lower label selects a particular version, component, or indexed member of the quantity. For example, x₀ and xₜ can be values at different positions.

Understand this part →

How to interpret it

Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

What the article says around this equation

Compression pays mostly CreuseC_{\text{reuse}} , a documented small fraction of a from-scratch training cost [ 3 ] , but only if a suitable large model is available to reuse in the first place. Training small on purpose pays CcurateC_{\text{curate}} and CtrainC_{\text{train}} in full, with no discount, in exchange for a model that inherits nothing it was not deliberately given. Architecture search pays CsearchC_{\text{search}} , which can be enormous when paid fresh per target [ 7 ] or amortized across many targets when paid once as a supernet [ 10 ] , on top of whatever strategy trains the architecture it discovers. Sparse mixture-of-experts is the odd one out in this accounting: its saving shows up only in \bar…
Read the full surrounding passage
Compression pays mostly CreuseC_{\text{reuse}} , a documented small fraction of a from-scratch training cost [ 3 ] , but only if a suitable large model is available to reuse in the first place. Training small on purpose pays CcurateC_{\text{curate}} and CtrainC_{\text{train}} in full, with no discount, in exchange for a model that inherits nothing it was not deliberately given. Architecture search pays CsearchC_{\text{search}} , which can be enormous when paid fresh per target [ 7 ] or amortized across many targets when paid once as a supernet [ 10 ] , on top of whatever strategy trains the architecture it discovers. Sparse mixture-of-experts is the odd one out in this accounting: its saving shows up only in cˉtok\bar c_{\text{tok}} , the cost per served token, and it does essentially nothing to relax the constraint MresidentM_{\text{resident}} ≤\le BmemB_{\text{mem}} that the other three strategies are built specifically to satisfy [ 13 , 12 ] .

Read the equation in its article →

Sources cited in the surrounding passage

These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.

Return to Shrink It, Train It Small, or Search for It: The Main Strategies for Small Models, Compared

See this formula across 1 published context →

Browse the mathematical compendium →