← Back to article

Equation 128 · The Clock That Comes Back Wrong by Exactly Its Mass

What does this equation mean?

≈0.29 rad\approx0.29\,\mathrm{rad}

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

How to interpret it

Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

What the article says around this equation

The scale of what needs to be canceled is worth stating plainly, using the same illustrative parameters as the previous section. The laser/center-of-mass term for a single-photon transition near 698\,nm\mathrm{nm} ( keffk_{\rm eff}≈\approx9.00×\times10^6\,m−1\mathrm{m^{-1}} ) scales as keffk_{\rm eff}gT2T^2≈\approx8.8×\times10^{7}\,rad\mathrm{rad} for T=1\,s\mathrm s . The recoil term for a strontium-mass atom ( m≈\approx1.443×\times10^{-25}\,kg\mathrm{kg} ) scales as ℏ\hbar keff2k_{\rm eff}^2T/m≈\approx5.9×\times10^{4}\,rad\mathrm{rad} . The clock term computed above is ≈\approx0.29\,rad\mathrm{rad} . Both confound terms are, respectively, roughly eight and five orders of magnitude larger than the signal, which is exactly why…
Read the full surrounding passage
The scale of what needs to be canceled is worth stating plainly, using the same illustrative parameters as the previous section. The laser/center-of-mass term for a single-photon transition near 698\,nm\mathrm{nm} ( keffk_{\rm eff}≈\approx9.00×\times10^6\,m−1\mathrm{m^{-1}} ) scales as keffk_{\rm eff}gT2T^2≈\approx8.8×\times10^{7}\,rad\mathrm{rad} for T=1\,s\mathrm s . The recoil term for a strontium-mass atom ( m≈\approx1.443×\times10^{-25}\,kg\mathrm{kg} ) scales as ℏ\hbar keff2k_{\rm eff}^2T/m≈\approx5.9×\times10^{4}\,rad\mathrm{rad} . The clock term computed above is ≈\approx0.29\,rad\mathrm{rad} . Both confound terms are, respectively, roughly eight and five orders of magnitude larger than the signal, which is exactly why isolating Δ\Deltaϕclock\phi_{\rm clock} is described in this literature as requiring careful differential design rather than being visible in a raw phase reading.

Read the equation in its article →

Sources cited in the article section

These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.

Return to The Clock That Comes Back Wrong by Exactly Its Mass

See this formula across 1 published context →

Browse the mathematical compendium →