← Back to article

Equation 9 · How AI Models Learned to Use Tools: A Protocol History

What does this equation mean?

M×NM \times N

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

MM

Symbol M

M is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.

Understand this part →

NN

Symbol N

N is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.

Understand this part →

multiplication

multiplication

Multiply the quantities on either side.

Understand this part →

How to interpret it

Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

What the article says around this equation

Two. The number of independently designed, mutually incompatible tool-calling schemas in wide production use will keep shrinking, not because of any new technical result but because switching costs increasingly favor the specification with foundation-level, multi-vendor governance over any single company’s dialect. The assumption behind this forecast is that the M ×\times N integration cost named above continues to bind as more hosts and more tools are built, making a shared protocol progressively cheaper relative to bespoke wrappers even for teams with no particular loyalty to any one vendor. Disconfirmed if , by the horizon, a majority of newly launched agent frameworks still ship a bespoke…
Read the full surrounding passage
Two. The number of independently designed, mutually incompatible tool-calling schemas in wide production use will keep shrinking, not because of any new technical result but because switching costs increasingly favor the specification with foundation-level, multi-vendor governance over any single company’s dialect. The assumption behind this forecast is that the M ×\times N integration cost named above continues to bind as more hosts and more tools are built, making a shared protocol progressively cheaper relative to bespoke wrappers even for teams with no particular loyalty to any one vendor. Disconfirmed if , by the horizon, a majority of newly launched agent frameworks still ship a bespoke tool-definition format with no MCP interoperability layer at all.

Read the equation in its article →

Sources cited in the article section

These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.

Return to How AI Models Learned to Use Tools: A Protocol History

See this formula across 3 published contexts →

Browse the mathematical compendium →