← Back to article

Equation 1 · From Origins to Frontier: A History of Post-CMOS, Neuromorphic, Photonic, and Quantum AI Compute

What does this equation mean?

M(q)=dφdq,v(t)=M(q(t)) i(t)M(q) = \frac{d\varphi}{dq}, \qquad v(t) = M\big(q(t)\big)\, i(t)

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

Start withdvarphi
Divide bydq
This relates toM(q)
How to read the two sides of this formula. Follow the article passage for the meaning of each quantity.

This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

MM

Symbol M

M is part of the quantity the equation computes from the expression on the right.

Understand this part →

qq

Symbol q

q occurs below the fraction bar. The quantity above the bar is divided by this expression; zero is excluded as a denominator.

Understand this part →

dd

Symbol d

d is an input to the expression that computes the quantity on the left.

Understand this part →

φ\varphi

Symbol varphi

varphi occurs above the fraction bar. The numerator is divided by the entire denominator below it.

Understand this part →

vv

Symbol v

v occurs above the fraction bar. The numerator is divided by the entire denominator below it.

Understand this part →

tt

Symbol t

t is an input to the expression that computes the quantity on the left.

Understand this part →

ii

Symbol i

i occurs above the fraction bar. The numerator is divided by the entire denominator below it.

Understand this part →

=

=

The expressions on both sides represent the same quantity under the stated assumptions.

Understand this part →

See an illustrated explanation →
fraction

fraction

Divide the expression above the line by the one below it.

Understand this part →

See an illustrated explanation →
dφd\varphi

Numerator: dvarphi

The complete quantity above the fraction bar.

Understand this part →

dqdq

Denominator: dq

The complete quantity below the fraction bar; it must be nonzero for this division.

Understand this part →

How to interpret it

With a fixed numerator, increasing a nonzero denominator reduces the fraction. Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

What the article says around this equation

In 1971, Leon Chua published “Memristor — The Missing Circuit Element” in IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory . His argument was one of pure symmetry, not empirical discovery. Circuit theory recognizes four fundamental variables — charge, current, voltage, and magnetic flux linkage — and, in 1971, three of the six possible pairwise relationships among them were already embodied in named components: the resistor relates voltage and current, the capacitor relates charge and voltage, the inductor relates flux linkage and current. Chua noticed that the sixth relationship, between charge and flux linkage, had no corresponding physical device, and reasoned from the completeness of the other five…
Read the full surrounding passage
In 1971, Leon Chua published “Memristor — The Missing Circuit Element” in IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory . His argument was one of pure symmetry, not empirical discovery. Circuit theory recognizes four fundamental variables — charge, current, voltage, and magnetic flux linkage — and, in 1971, three of the six possible pairwise relationships among them were already embodied in named components: the resistor relates voltage and current, the capacitor relates charge and voltage, the inductor relates flux linkage and current. Chua noticed that the sixth relationship, between charge and flux linkage, had no corresponding physical device, and reasoned from the completeness of the other five that one should exist. He named the missing element the memristor and gave it a defining relation: M(q)=dφdq,v(t)=M(q(t)) i(t)M(q) = \frac{d\varphi}{dq}, \qquad v(t) = M\big(q(t)\big)\, i(t). where M(q) , the memristance, depends on the history of charge q that has flowed through the device — which is precisely what makes a memristor’s resistance a record of its own past, and precisely why it was recognized decades later as a natural candidate for an analogue, in-memory synaptic weight [ 3 ] .

Read the equation in its article →

Sources cited in the surrounding passage

These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.

Return to From Origins to Frontier: A History of Post-CMOS, Neuromorphic, Photonic, and Quantum AI Compute

See this formula across 1 published context →

Browse the mathematical compendium →