Equation 1 · From Origins to Frontier: A History of Post-CMOS, Neuromorphic, Photonic, and Quantum AI Compute
What does this equation mean?
Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.
This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.
Read it piece by piece
Symbol M
M is part of the quantity the equation computes from the expression on the right.
Symbol q
q occurs below the fraction bar. The quantity above the bar is divided by this expression; zero is excluded as a denominator.
Symbol d
d is an input to the expression that computes the quantity on the left.
Symbol varphi
varphi occurs above the fraction bar. The numerator is divided by the entire denominator below it.
Symbol v
v occurs above the fraction bar. The numerator is divided by the entire denominator below it.
Symbol t
t is an input to the expression that computes the quantity on the left.
Symbol i
i occurs above the fraction bar. The numerator is divided by the entire denominator below it.
=
The expressions on both sides represent the same quantity under the stated assumptions.
See an illustrated explanation →Denominator: dq
The complete quantity below the fraction bar; it must be nonzero for this division.
How to interpret it
With a fixed numerator, increasing a nonzero denominator reduces the fraction. Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.
What the article says around this equation
In 1971, Leon Chua published “Memristor — The Missing Circuit Element” in IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory . His argument was one of pure symmetry, not empirical discovery. Circuit theory recognizes four fundamental variables — charge, current, voltage, and magnetic flux linkage — and, in 1971, three of the six possible pairwise relationships among them were already embodied in named components: the resistor relates voltage and current, the capacitor relates charge and voltage, the inductor relates flux linkage and current. Chua noticed that the sixth relationship, between charge and flux linkage, had no corresponding physical device, and reasoned from the completeness of the other five…
Read the full surrounding passage
In 1971, Leon Chua published “Memristor — The Missing Circuit Element” in IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory . His argument was one of pure symmetry, not empirical discovery. Circuit theory recognizes four fundamental variables — charge, current, voltage, and magnetic flux linkage — and, in 1971, three of the six possible pairwise relationships among them were already embodied in named components: the resistor relates voltage and current, the capacitor relates charge and voltage, the inductor relates flux linkage and current. Chua noticed that the sixth relationship, between charge and flux linkage, had no corresponding physical device, and reasoned from the completeness of the other five that one should exist. He named the missing element the memristor and gave it a defining relation: . where M(q) , the memristance, depends on the history of charge q that has flowed through the device — which is precisely what makes a memristor’s resistance a record of its own past, and precisely why it was recognized decades later as a natural candidate for an analogue, in-memory synaptic weight [ 3 ] .
Sources cited in the surrounding passage
These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.