Equation 3 · Comparing the Main Approaches to Evolutionary Biology and Ecology
What does this equation mean?
Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.
This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.
Read it piece by piece
Symbol p_t+1
+1 is the next indexed value computed from the current indexed quantity and the update terms shown on the right.
Symbol p_t
is one of the signed contributions combined to compute the quantity on the left.
Symbol s
s is one of the signed contributions combined to compute the quantity on the left.
=
The expressions on both sides represent the same quantity under the stated assumptions.
See an illustrated explanation →subscript
The lower label selects a particular version, component, or indexed member of the quantity. For example, x₀ and xₜ can be values at different positions.
Denominator: 1 + s p_t
The complete quantity below the fraction bar; it must be nonzero for this division.
How to interpret it
With a fixed numerator, increasing a nonzero denominator reduces the fraction. Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.
What the article says around this equation
A basic model of directional selection acting on a single locus, of the kind both the field and laboratory results above are ultimately interpreted against, describes how an allele’s frequency changes by one generation under a constant selection coefficient s favoring the allele at frequency p : . The equation exposes the model’s real content: selection is strongest while the favored allele is at intermediate frequency, where is largest, and weakens automatically as the allele nears fixation or loss, purely from the algebra of the denominator — a pattern of decelerating change that shows up empirically in both the Grants’ beak-size tracking and the LTEE’s…
Read the full surrounding passage
A basic model of directional selection acting on a single locus, of the kind both the field and laboratory results above are ultimately interpreted against, describes how an allele’s frequency changes by one generation under a constant selection coefficient s favoring the allele at frequency p : . The equation exposes the model’s real content: selection is strongest while the favored allele is at intermediate frequency, where is largest, and weakens automatically as the allele nears fixation or loss, purely from the algebra of the denominator — a pattern of decelerating change that shows up empirically in both the Grants’ beak-size tracking and the LTEE’s fitness trajectories, even though the two systems differ in essentially everything else about how the selection coefficient s itself is generated.
Sources cited in the article section
- [3] E. coli long-term evolution experiment ↗
- [4] Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli ↗
These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.
Return to Comparing the Main Approaches to Evolutionary Biology and Ecology