← Back to article

Equation 37 · Naive, Graph, and Agentic: A Systems Comparison of RAG Architectures

What does this equation mean?

k=1k = 1

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

Inputs and operations1
Result or conditionk
How to read the two sides of this formula. Follow the article passage for the meaning of each quantity.

This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

kk

Symbol k

k is part of the quantity the equation computes from the expression on the right.

Understand this part →

=

=

The expressions on both sides represent the same quantity under the stated assumptions.

Understand this part →

See an illustrated explanation →

How to interpret it

Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

What the article says around this equation

For naive and hybrid RAG, k = 1 by construction — the sum has exactly one term, and total latency is boundable in advance for any query. For iterative RAG, k is a small integer set by a heuristic or a step cap chosen by the system builder, so the worst case is known even though the typical case varies with question difficulty. For agentic RAG, k is a random variable generated by the policy itself at run time, and its distribution is exactly what the operator does not control without adding an external cap. The same formula describes all five families; what changes is only where k comes from, and that difference is the whole of the engineering distinction between “a pipeline with a loop in…
Read the full surrounding passage
For naive and hybrid RAG, k = 1 by construction — the sum has exactly one term, and total latency is boundable in advance for any query. For iterative RAG, k is a small integer set by a heuristic or a step cap chosen by the system builder, so the worst case is known even though the typical case varies with question difficulty. For agentic RAG, k is a random variable generated by the policy itself at run time, and its distribution is exactly what the operator does not control without adding an external cap. The same formula describes all five families; what changes is only where k comes from, and that difference is the whole of the engineering distinction between “a pipeline with a loop in it” and “a policy that decides how much to loop.”

Read the equation in its article →

Sources cited in the article section

These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.

Return to Naive, Graph, and Agentic: A Systems Comparison of RAG Architectures

See this formula across 2 published contexts →

Browse the mathematical compendium →