← Back to article

Equation 2 · An Optical Fabric Turns Off-Package Memory Into an Extension of the Die

What does this equation mean?

L=BWopt / PoptBWcu / PcuL = \frac{BW_{\text{opt}} \,/\, P_{\text{opt}}}{BW_{\text{cu}} \,/\, P_{\text{cu}}}

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

Start withBW_opt / P_opt
Divide byBW_cu / P_cu
This relates toL
How to read the two sides of this formula. Follow the article passage for the meaning of each quantity.

This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

LL

Symbol L

the computing.

Understand this part →

BB

Symbol B

B is an input to the expression that computes the quantity on the left.

Understand this part →

WoptW_{\text{opt}}

Symbol W_opt

WoW_opt occurs above the fraction bar. The numerator is divided by the entire denominator below it.

Understand this part →

PoptP_{\text{opt}}

Symbol P_opt

PoP_opt occurs above the fraction bar. The numerator is divided by the entire denominator below it.

Understand this part →

WcuW_{\text{cu}}

Symbol W_cu

WcW_cu occurs below the fraction bar. The quantity above the bar is divided by this expression; zero is excluded as a denominator.

Understand this part →

PcuP_{\text{cu}}

Symbol P_cu

PcP_cu occurs below the fraction bar. The quantity above the bar is divided by this expression; zero is excluded as a denominator.

Understand this part →

=

=

The expressions on both sides represent the same quantity under the stated assumptions.

Understand this part →

See an illustrated explanation →
fraction

fraction

Divide the expression above the line by the one below it.

Understand this part →

See an illustrated explanation →
subscript

subscript

The lower label selects a particular version, component, or indexed member of the quantity. For example, x₀ and xₜ can be values at different positions.

Understand this part →

BWopt / PoptBW_{\text{opt}} \,/\, P_{\text{opt}}

Numerator: BW_opt / P_opt

The complete quantity above the fraction bar.

Understand this part →

BWcu / PcuBW_{\text{cu}} \,/\, P_{\text{cu}}

Denominator: BW_cu / P_cu

The complete quantity below the fraction bar; it must be nonzero for this division.

Understand this part →

How to interpret it

With a fixed numerator, increasing a nonzero denominator reduces the fraction. Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

What the article says around this equation

I define a compute-to-memory locality index, L , as the ratio of two bandwidth-per-joule figures: the realized random-access bandwidth a system can sustain across its full memory pool, divided by the power it costs to sustain that bandwidth, computed once for the optically unified case and once for the same total memory capacity attached the conventional way — as edge-limited HBM and DDR stacks wired electrically to a die of the same process generation. Here BW is realized, measured random-access bandwidth in bytes per second — not a marketing peak, not a sequential-streaming figure, since random access is what most large-model inference and any pooled-memory workload actually demands — and…
Read the full surrounding passage
I define a compute-to-memory locality index, L , as the ratio of two bandwidth-per-joule figures: the realized random-access bandwidth a system can sustain across its full memory pool, divided by the power it costs to sustain that bandwidth, computed once for the optically unified case and once for the same total memory capacity attached the conventional way — as edge-limited HBM and DDR stacks wired electrically to a die of the same process generation. Here BW is realized, measured random-access bandwidth in bytes per second — not a marketing peak, not a sequential-streaming figure, since random access is what most large-model inference and any pooled-memory workload actually demands — and P is the power, in watts, that a system actually draws to sustain that bandwidth, attributable specifically to the memory-and-fabric subsystem rather than the whole machine. An index above 1 means the optical, unified case delivers more usable bandwidth per unit of energy than wiring the same total capacity to the die’s edge the ordinary way — a real, measurable locality gain, not just a capacity or reach gain. An index at or below 1, once the fabric’s own fixed integration overhead — the extra lasers, the photonic-PIC yield cost, the switch silicon itself — is amortized across a realistic deployment scale, is the condition under which “extension of the die” collapses into a more expensive way to get the same joules-per-bit a conventional design already gets, dressed in a bigger address-space number.

Read the equation in its article →

For background, read the article’s source list.

Return to An Optical Fabric Turns Off-Package Memory Into an Extension of the Die

See this formula across 1 published context →

Browse the mathematical compendium →