Published equation contexts
Why this formula appears here
Nearly all standard analysis assumes that neural activity and the measured signal are related by a linear time-invariant system, so that the measured time course is a convolution of an underlying activity time course with a canonical response function plus noise: . Writing it this way exposes what is being assumed rather than measured: that h is known, that it is the same across regions, subjects and states, and that the mapping from n to y is linear. Each of those is an approximation with documented exceptions.
Read the representative guide
Symbol t
t is an argument of the function-like quantity on the left; its role is set by that function’s stated inputs.
Read this term in its guide →Symbol h
known, that it is the same across regions, subjects and states, and that the mapping from n to y is linear.
Read this term in its guide →Symbol τ
τ is one of the signed contributions combined to compute the quantity on the left.
Read this term in its guide →Symbol n
n is one of the signed contributions combined to compute the quantity on the left.
Read this term in its guide →Symbol d
d is one of the signed contributions combined to compute the quantity on the left.
Read this term in its guide →Symbol varepsilon
varepsilon is one of the signed contributions combined to compute the quantity on the left.
Read this term in its guide →Starting index or lower bound: 0
This label says where the repeated addition, multiplication, or accumulation starts. Read its value or condition together with the article’s description of the index.
Read this term in its guide →Ending index or upper bound: infty
This label says where the repeated addition, multiplication, or accumulation stops. It sets the last term or end of the range.
Read this term in its guide →How to interpret it
Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.
Research cited beside this formula
Published contexts (1)
A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.
Equation 3 · Neuroscience
What a Neural Recording Actually Records
This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions.
Nearly all standard analysis assumes that neural activity and the measured signal are related by a linear time-invariant system, so that the measured time course is a convolution of an underlying activity time course with a canonical response function plus noise: . Writing it this way exposes what is being assumed rather than measured: that h is known, that it is the same across regions, subjects and states, and that the mapping from n to y is linear. Each of those is an approximation with documented exceptions.
Meanings in this article
- : linear.
- : known, that it is the same across regions, subjects and states, and that the mapping from n to y is linear.