← Mathematical compendium

Published equation contexts

uc(y)u_c(y)

Why this formula appears here

Uncertainty itself has a standard grammar, laid out in the GUM and adopted domestically by NIST in Technical Note 1297. Every source of doubt about a measured value is classified as either a Type A evaluation — estimated from the statistical scatter of repeated observations — or a Type B evaluation — estimated from any other information, such as a calibration certificate, a manufacturer’s specification, or physical reasoning about a known systematic effect [ 2 ] [ 3 ] . These component uncertainties are combined, following an explicit propagation rule, into a combined standard uncertainty, which is then multiplied by a coverage factor (conventionally k=2 , corresponding loosely to a 95%…

Read the full article-specific guide →

Read the representative guide

ucu_c

Symbol u_c

ucu_c is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.

Read this term in its guide →
yy

Symbol y

y is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.

Read this term in its guide →

How to interpret it

Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

Research cited beside this formula

Published contexts (1)

A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.

uc(y)u_c(y)

Equation 2 · Scientific Methods

Comparing the Main Approaches to Scientific Instruments and Metrology

This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text.

Uncertainty itself has a standard grammar, laid out in the GUM and adopted domestically by NIST in Technical Note 1297. Every source of doubt about a measured value is classified as either a Type A evaluation — estimated from the statistical scatter of repeated observations — or a Type B evaluation — estimated from any other information, such as a calibration certificate, a manufacturer’s specification, or physical reasoning about a known systematic effect [ 2 ] [ 3 ] . These component uncertainties are combined, following an explicit propagation rule, into a combined standard uncertainty, which is then multiplied by a coverage factor (conventionally k=2 , corresponding loosely to a 95%…

Equation guide → · Article →