← Mathematical compendium

Published equation contexts

wceiling(t)=1+a t1+b tw_{\text{ceiling}}(t) = 1 + \frac{a\,t}{1 + b\,t}

Why this formula appears here

Against that record, Wiser, Ribeck and Lenski fit fitness trajectories from all twelve populations across 50,000 generations against two competing functional shapes for how relative fitness might grow with time. One is a form that saturates — fitness rising quickly at first and then flattening toward a fixed asymptote, the kind of ceiling a “diminishing returns” reading of Lenski’s 1991 result would predict. The other is a power-law form, with no fixed limit: growth continues indefinitely, at an ever-slowing rate that nonetheless never reaches zero. Schematically, the contrast is between something like wceiling(t)=1+a t1+b tw_{\text{ceiling}}(t) = 1 + \frac{a\,t}{1 + b\,t}. which approaches a fixed value of 1 + a/b as t grows without bound,…

Read the full article-specific guide →

Read the representative guide

wceilingw_{\text{ceiling}}

Symbol w_ceiling

wcw_ceiling is part of the quantity the equation computes from the expression on the right.

Read this term in its guide →
bb

Symbol b

b occurs below the fraction bar. The quantity above the bar is divided by this expression; zero is excluded as a denominator.

Read this term in its guide →

How to interpret it

With a fixed numerator, increasing a nonzero denominator reduces the fraction. Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

Research cited beside this formula

Published contexts (1)

A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.

wceiling(t)=1+a t1+b tw_{\text{ceiling}}(t) = 1 + \frac{a\,t}{1 + b\,t}

Equation 1 · Evolutionary Biology

Seventy-Five Thousand Generations of E. coli, and Counting

This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions.

Against that record, Wiser, Ribeck and Lenski fit fitness trajectories from all twelve populations across 50,000 generations against two competing functional shapes for how relative fitness might grow with time. One is a form that saturates — fitness rising quickly at first and then flattening toward a fixed asymptote, the kind of ceiling a “diminishing returns” reading of Lenski’s 1991 result would predict. The other is a power-law form, with no fixed limit: growth continues indefinitely, at an ever-slowing rate that nonetheless never reaches zero. Schematically, the contrast is between something like wceiling(t)=1+a t1+b tw_{\text{ceiling}}(t) = 1 + \frac{a\,t}{1 + b\,t}. which approaches a fixed value of 1 + a/b as t grows without bound,…

Equation guide → · Article →