Published equation contexts
Why this formula appears here
Set s = 1 , the theoretical maximum in which every affected embryo is detected and never implanted: for q = 0.01 , this gives = /(1+) 0.009901 , a reduction of under one-tenth of one percent of the allele’s frequency in a single generation, even at total, universal, perfectly effective screening. The reason the effect is so small is structural, not a modeling artifact: for a rare recessive allele, the overwhelming majority of copies are carried silently in heterozygous carriers, invisible to any selection that acts only on homozygotes, and embryo selection — like natural selection against recessive disease before it — can only ever act on the small fraction of matings…
Read the representative guide
How to interpret it
Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.
Research cited beside this formula
Published contexts (2)
A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.
Equation 4 · Technological Evolution
Human Evolution Did Not Stop, and Medicine Is Now Steering It
This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions.
Set s = 1 , the theoretical maximum in which every affected embryo is detected and never implanted: for q = 0.01 , this gives = /(1+) 0.009901 , a reduction of under one-tenth of one percent of the allele’s frequency in a single generation, even at total, universal, perfectly effective screening. The reason the effect is so small is structural, not a modeling artifact: for a rare recessive allele, the overwhelming majority of copies are carried silently in heterozygous carriers, invisible to any selection that acts only on homozygotes, and embryo selection — like natural selection against recessive disease before it — can only ever act on the small fraction of matings…
Meanings in this article
Equation guide → · Article →Equation 8 · Technological Evolution
Human Evolution Did Not Stop, and Medicine Is Now Steering It
This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions.
Set s = 1 , the theoretical maximum in which every affected embryo is detected and never implanted: for q = 0.01 , this gives = /(1+) 0.009901 , a reduction of under one-tenth of one percent of the allele’s frequency in a single generation, even at total, universal, perfectly effective screening. The reason the effect is so small is structural, not a modeling artifact: for a rare recessive allele, the overwhelming majority of copies are carried silently in heterozygous carriers, invisible to any selection that acts only on homozygotes, and embryo selection — like natural selection against recessive disease before it — can only ever act on the small fraction of matings…