Symbol k
k is part of the quantity the equation computes from the expression on the right.
Read this term in its guide →Published equation contexts
Why this formula appears here
Uncertainty itself has a standard grammar, laid out in the GUM and adopted domestically by NIST in Technical Note 1297. Every source of doubt about a measured value is classified as either a Type A evaluation — estimated from the statistical scatter of repeated observations — or a Type B evaluation — estimated from any other information, such as a calibration certificate, a manufacturer’s specification, or physical reasoning about a known systematic effect [ 2 ] [ 3 ] . These component uncertainties are combined, following an explicit propagation rule, into a combined standard uncertainty, which is then multiplied by a coverage factor (conventionally k=2 , corresponding loosely to a 95%…
Read the representative guide
How to interpret it
Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.
Research cited beside this formula
Published contexts (1)
A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.
Equation 1 · Scientific Methods
Comparing the Main Approaches to Scientific Instruments and Metrology
This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions.
Uncertainty itself has a standard grammar, laid out in the GUM and adopted domestically by NIST in Technical Note 1297. Every source of doubt about a measured value is classified as either a Type A evaluation — estimated from the statistical scatter of repeated observations — or a Type B evaluation — estimated from any other information, such as a calibration certificate, a manufacturer’s specification, or physical reasoning about a known systematic effect [ 2 ] [ 3 ] . These component uncertainties are combined, following an explicit propagation rule, into a combined standard uncertainty, which is then multiplied by a coverage factor (conventionally k=2 , corresponding loosely to a 95%…
Equation guide → · Article →