Symbol k_B
is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.
Read this term in its guide →Published equation contexts
Everything above concerns [] , a bound on unitary orthogonalizations, which cost no minimum heat in principle: a sequence of reversible gates can in principle run adiabatically, with no thermodynamic floor at all beyond the ordinary Levitin-Toffoli rate. Reading out a result, however, generally requires erasing or resetting some register, and that step is bound by a different and independent piece of physics, Landauer’s principle: erasing one bit at local temperature T costs at least T2 of dissipated heat [ 6 ] , made precise with finite-size corrections by Reeb and Wolf [ 7 ] . This bound does not care about horizons at all except through whatever value T takes locally —…
is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.
Read this term in its guide →T is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.
Read this term in its guide →Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.
A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.
Equation 93 · Evolutionary Physics
This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text.
Everything above concerns [] , a bound on unitary orthogonalizations, which cost no minimum heat in principle: a sequence of reversible gates can in principle run adiabatically, with no thermodynamic floor at all beyond the ordinary Levitin-Toffoli rate. Reading out a result, however, generally requires erasing or resetting some register, and that step is bound by a different and independent piece of physics, Landauer’s principle: erasing one bit at local temperature T costs at least T2 of dissipated heat [ 6 ] , made precise with finite-size corrections by Reeb and Wolf [ 7 ] . This bound does not care about horizons at all except through whatever value T takes locally —…
Equation guide → · Article →Equation 1 · Physics
This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text.
Szilard reduced Maxwell’s population of molecules to the simplest case that still carried the paradox: a single gas particle in a box. An external agent measures which half of the box the particle occupies, inserts a partition, and lets the particle push a piston on the side it occupies, converting the result of that one-bit measurement into extractable work. Szilard showed that the demon’s ability to extract work was tied exactly to the amount of information it acquired in the measurement — one bit of information corresponds to a definite quantity of work, T 2 , where is Boltzmann’s constant and T is the bath temperature. This is worth stating as an equation because it is the…
Equation 5 · Physics
This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text.
The decisive correction came from Rolf Landauer at IBM in 1961, in “Irreversibility and Heat Generation in the Computing Process,” published in the IBM Journal of Research and Development [ 2 ] . Landauer was not working on Maxwell’s demon directly — his subject was the physical limits of computation, motivated by IBM’s practical interest in how much heat a computing device must dissipate. His central claim, now called Landauer’s principle, was that logically irreversible operations — operations that map two or more distinct input states onto the same output state, of which erasing a bit of memory is the paradigm case — must dissipate at least T 2 of heat into the environment per bit…
Equation guide → · Article →Equation 6 · Physics
This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text.
It is worth being explicit about what remained unverified in 1961: Landauer’s paper was a theoretical argument grounded in general reasoning about bistable physical systems, not a measurement. No experiment existed, or could have existed with 1961-era instrumentation, capable of resolving a T2 heat signature from a single erased bit — that quantity, at room temperature, is on the order of 10^{-21} joules, far below the noise floor of any calorimetry available at the time. The principle stood as an unconfirmed but increasingly trusted theoretical result for more than fifty years.
Equation guide → · Article →Equation 15 · Physics
This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text.
That same year, Shoichi Toyabe, Sagawa, Ueda, Eiro Muneyuki, and Masaki Sano built and ran the device, reporting “Experimental Demonstration of Information-to-Energy Conversion and Validation of the Generalized Jarzynski Equality” in Nature Physics [ 8 ] . Their apparatus used a single colloidal particle on a spiral-staircase-shaped potential created by a rotating electric field; real-time feedback, triggered by measuring which way the particle had diffused, allowed the particle to climb the staircase using only thermal fluctuations and the information gained by observation, extracting free energy in excess of the direct work performed on it and confirming the Sagawa-Ueda generalized…
Equation guide → · Article →Equation 17 · Physics
This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text.
The last major gap in this record closed two years later. Landauer’s 1961 principle had stood for half a century as a trusted but experimentally unconfirmed claim, mainly because dissipating and resolving a heat signal on the order of 10^{-21} joules from a single bit erasure was beyond available calorimetry. Antoine Bérut, Artak Arakelyan, Artyom Petrosyan, Sergio Ciliberto, Raoul Dillenschneider, and Eric Lutz closed that gap in 2012 with “Experimental Verification of Landauer’s Principle Linking Information and Thermodynamics,” published in Nature [ 9 ] . Rather than attempting calorimetry on an electronic bit, they built a colloidal analogue: a single micron-scale bead confined in a…
Equation guide → · Article →