Published equation contexts
Why this formula appears here
Now suppose each individual tool call has some small, independent probability p of being consequential and wrong in a way a reviewer would have caught. The probability that at least one such call executes, unreviewed, inside a single gap of g calls is . This is the same “at least one” shape that shows up whenever independent trials are combined, applied here to the opposite question from the one it usually answers: not how many attempts are needed before one succeeds, but how many unwatched actions occur before one goes wrong. For small g , exposure grows almost linearly — each additional ungated action adds roughly p more exposure — so coarsening from asking every time to…
Read the representative guide
Symbol g
g is one of the signed contributions combined to compute the quantity on the left.
Read this term in its guide →How to interpret it
Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.
Published contexts (1)
A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.
Equation 10 · AI Agents & Systems
Comparing the Main Approaches to Claude Code and Agentic Development Tools
This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions.
Now suppose each individual tool call has some small, independent probability p of being consequential and wrong in a way a reviewer would have caught. The probability that at least one such call executes, unreviewed, inside a single gap of g calls is . This is the same “at least one” shape that shows up whenever independent trials are combined, applied here to the opposite question from the one it usually answers: not how many attempts are needed before one succeeds, but how many unwatched actions occur before one goes wrong. For small g , exposure grows almost linearly — each additional ungated action adds roughly p more exposure — so coarsening from asking every time to…