Symbol hatepsilon
hatepsilon is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.
Read this term in its guide →Published equation contexts
Why this formula appears here
Whether automated LLM-judge evaluation becomes trusted for high-stakes decisions is not a third axis; it is mostly a readout of Axis A applied to one specific evaluator. A useful way to see the dependency is to write the automation decision as a threshold rule. Let be the estimated error rate of a judge on a decision class a , and let be the maximum error a policy is willing to tolerate for that stakes class. A defensible automation rule is
Read the representative guide
Symbol a
a is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.
Read this term in its guide →How to interpret it
Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.
Research cited beside this formula
Published contexts (1)
A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.
Equation 1 · Model Evaluation
Agent Evaluation in 2035: Two Axes, Four Scenarios, and What Would Falsify Them
This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text.
Whether automated LLM-judge evaluation becomes trusted for high-stakes decisions is not a third axis; it is mostly a readout of Axis A applied to one specific evaluator. A useful way to see the dependency is to write the automation decision as a threshold rule. Let be the estimated error rate of a judge on a decision class a , and let be the maximum error a policy is willing to tolerate for that stakes class. A defensible automation rule is
Equation guide → · Article →