← Mathematical compendium

Published equation contexts

dx(t)dt=−[1τ+f(x(t),I(t),t,θ)]⊙x(t)+f(x(t),I(t),t,θ)⊙A\frac{d\mathbf{x}(t)}{dt} = -\left[\frac{1}{\tau} + f(\mathbf{x}(t),\mathbf{I}(t),t,\theta)\right]\odot \mathbf{x}(t) + f(\mathbf{x}(t),\mathbf{I}(t),t,\theta)\odot A

Why this formula appears here

Two different claims are living inside one paper, and only one of them is fully licensed by what was actually tested. The Vorbach result is a property of a model class : an LTC network, described by the ordinary differential equation the paper reproduces as dx(t)dt=−[1τ+f(x(t),I(t),t,θ)]⊙x(t)+f(x(t),I(t),t,θ)⊙A\frac{d\mathbf{x}(t)}{dt} = -\left[\frac{1}{\tau} + f(\mathbf{x}(t),\mathbf{I}(t),t,\theta)\right]\odot \mathbf{x}(t) + f(\mathbf{x}(t),\mathbf{I}(t),t,\theta)\odot A . reduces to a DCM whenever its learned function f satisfies three stated analytic conditions [ 1 , 2 ] . That is a real theorem about the architecture’s dynamical form, established independently of this drone task, and nothing in this article disputes it. What it does not supply, on its own, is a certificate that the specific f this paper’s networks actually learned from confounded pixel data recovers the task’s true…

Read the full article-specific guide →

Read the representative guide

τ\tau

Symbol τ

τ occurs below the fraction bar. The quantity above the bar is divided by this expression; zero is excluded as a denominator.

Read this term in its guide →

How to interpret it

With a fixed numerator, increasing a nonzero denominator reduces the fraction. Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

Research cited beside this formula

Learn the mathematics behind it

Published contexts (1)

A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.

dx(t)dt=−[1τ+f(x(t),I(t),t,θ)]⊙x(t)+f(x(t),I(t),t,θ)⊙A,\frac{d\mathbf{x}(t)}{dt} = -\left[\frac{1}{\tau} + f(\mathbf{x}(t),\mathbf{I}(t),t,\theta)\right]\odot \mathbf{x}(t) + f(\mathbf{x}(t),\mathbf{I}(t),t,\theta)\odot A ,

Equation 1 · AI Research

Every Test Changed the Scene and Kept the Chair Red

This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions.

Two different claims are living inside one paper, and only one of them is fully licensed by what was actually tested. The Vorbach result is a property of a model class : an LTC network, described by the ordinary differential equation the paper reproduces as dx(t)dt=−[1τ+f(x(t),I(t),t,θ)]⊙x(t)+f(x(t),I(t),t,θ)⊙A\frac{d\mathbf{x}(t)}{dt} = -\left[\frac{1}{\tau} + f(\mathbf{x}(t),\mathbf{I}(t),t,\theta)\right]\odot \mathbf{x}(t) + f(\mathbf{x}(t),\mathbf{I}(t),t,\theta)\odot A . reduces to a DCM whenever its learned function f satisfies three stated analytic conditions [ 1 , 2 ] . That is a real theorem about the architecture’s dynamical form, established independently of this drone task, and nothing in this article disputes it. What it does not supply, on its own, is a certificate that the specific f this paper’s networks actually learned from confounded pixel data recovers the task’s true…

Equation guide → · Article →