← Mathematical compendium

Published equation contexts

SE(p^)=p^(1−p^)n\mathrm{SE}(\hat p) = \sqrt{\frac{\hat p (1 - \hat p)}{n}}

Why this formula appears here

That instability is worth making precise rather than gesturing at. If a benchmark of n instances is treated as n independent Bernoulli trials with true resolve probability p , the standard error of the observed proportion p^\hat p is SE(p^)=p^(1−p^)n\mathrm{SE}(\hat p) = \sqrt{\frac{\hat p (1 - \hat p)}{n}}. For n = 500 and p^\hat p near one half, this is on the order of two percentage points — before accounting for the additional variance introduced by sampling temperature, agentic scaffolding, or a different number of retries per problem. A published gap of four or five points between two systems evaluated under different harnesses, different reasoning-effort settings, and different retry budgets is not obviously a capability gap at all; it may be…

Read the full article-specific guide →

Read the representative guide

nn

Symbol n

n occurs below the fraction bar. The quantity above the bar is divided by this expression; zero is excluded as a denominator.

Read this term in its guide →

How to interpret it

With a fixed numerator, increasing a nonzero denominator reduces the fraction. Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

Research cited beside this formula

Published contexts (1)

A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.

SE(p^)=p^(1−p^)n.\mathrm{SE}(\hat p) = \sqrt{\frac{\hat p (1 - \hat p)}{n}}.

Equation 5 · AI Agents & Systems

Measuring Claude Code and Agentic Development Tools: Evidence, Benchmarks, and Uncertainty

This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions.

That instability is worth making precise rather than gesturing at. If a benchmark of n instances is treated as n independent Bernoulli trials with true resolve probability p , the standard error of the observed proportion p^\hat p is SE(p^)=p^(1−p^)n\mathrm{SE}(\hat p) = \sqrt{\frac{\hat p (1 - \hat p)}{n}}. For n = 500 and p^\hat p near one half, this is on the order of two percentage points — before accounting for the additional variance introduced by sampling temperature, agentic scaffolding, or a different number of retries per problem. A published gap of four or five points between two systems evaluated under different harnesses, different reasoning-effort settings, and different retry budgets is not obviously a capability gap at all; it may be…

Meanings in this article

Equation guide → · Article →