← Mathematical compendium
Published equation contexts
CAI
Why this formula appears here
State in advance what each outcome would mean, so the test can be graded rather than argued with after the fact. To make the arithmetic concrete — using invented placeholder numbers only, to illustrate what the ratio means, not anything measured — suppose CfC’s Urban Patio baseline stayed at its published 67.5% while its measured CAI under the recolor intervention came back at 61%. That would give RRR(CfC) ≈ 0.90 : high, and hard to explain without the network actually tracking the target’s identity rather than its color. Suppose instead the same baseline of 67.5% paired with a measured CAI of 9%, most of those trials converging on the red decoy…
Read the full article-specific guide →
How to interpret it
Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.
Research cited beside this formula
Published contexts (2)
A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.
Equation 11 · AI Research
This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text.
State in advance what each outcome would mean, so the test can be graded rather than argued with after the fact. To make the arithmetic concrete — using invented placeholder numbers only, to illustrate what the ratio means, not anything measured — suppose CfC’s Urban Patio baseline stayed at its published 67.5% while its measured CAI under the recolor intervention came back at 61%. That would give RRR(CfC) ≈ 0.90 : high, and hard to explain without the network actually tracking the target’s identity rather than its color. Suppose instead the same baseline of 67.5% paired with a measured CAI of 9%, most of those trials converging on the red decoy…
Equation guide → ·
Article →Equation 13 · AI Research
This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text.
State in advance what each outcome would mean, so the test can be graded rather than argued with after the fact. To make the arithmetic concrete — using invented placeholder numbers only, to illustrate what the ratio means, not anything measured — suppose CfC’s Urban Patio baseline stayed at its published 67.5% while its measured CAI under the recolor intervention came back at 61%. That would give RRR(CfC) ≈ 0.90 : high, and hard to explain without the network actually tracking the target’s identity rather than its color. Suppose instead the same baseline of 67.5% paired with a measured CAI of 9%, most of those trials converging on the red decoy…
Equation guide → ·
Article →