← Mathematical compendium

Published equation contexts

Vt  =  Atcv,ϕt  =  VtGt  =  Atcv GtV_t \;=\; \frac{A_t}{c_v}, \qquad \phi_t \;=\; \frac{V_t}{G_t} \;=\; \frac{A_t}{c_v \, G_t}

Why this formula appears here

An accounting identity makes the consequence visible. Let GtG_t be the number of claims placed before some audience in period t , let AtA_t be that audience’s total attention budget, and let cvc_v be the average attention cost of verifying one claim. The number of claims that can be verified, and the fraction ϕt\phi_t of what arrives that is actually checked, are then Vt  =  Atcv,ϕt  =  VtGt  =  Atcv GtV_t \;=\; \frac{A_t}{c_v}, \qquad \phi_t \;=\; \frac{V_t}{G_t} \;=\; \frac{A_t}{c_v \, G_t}. This is bookkeeping, not a finding. Its only content is what it forbids. Simon’s point was that AtA_t is bounded by hours and by human processing capacity, and that this bound is not responsive to technology in the way that GtG_t is. If GtG_t rises by an order of magnitude, ϕt\phi_t falls by an order of magnitude unless…

Read the full article-specific guide →

Read the representative guide

GtG_t

Symbol G_t

the number of claims placed before some audience in period t , let AtA_t be that audience’s total attention budget, and let cvc_v be the average attention cost of verifying one claim.

Read this term in its guide →
cv Gtc_v \, G_t

Denominator: c_v G_t

The complete quantity below the fraction bar; it must be nonzero for this division.

Read this term in its guide →

How to interpret it

With a fixed numerator, increasing a nonzero denominator reduces the fraction. Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

Published contexts (1)

A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.

Vt  =  Atcv,ϕt  =  VtGt  =  Atcv Gt.V_t \;=\; \frac{A_t}{c_v}, \qquad \phi_t \;=\; \frac{V_t}{G_t} \;=\; \frac{A_t}{c_v \, G_t}.

Equation 6 · Institutions & Economy

When Generation Becomes Free, Attention Becomes the Scarce Good

This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions.

An accounting identity makes the consequence visible. Let GtG_t be the number of claims placed before some audience in period t , let AtA_t be that audience’s total attention budget, and let cvc_v be the average attention cost of verifying one claim. The number of claims that can be verified, and the fraction ϕt\phi_t of what arrives that is actually checked, are then Vt  =  Atcv,ϕt  =  VtGt  =  Atcv GtV_t \;=\; \frac{A_t}{c_v}, \qquad \phi_t \;=\; \frac{V_t}{G_t} \;=\; \frac{A_t}{c_v \, G_t}. This is bookkeeping, not a finding. Its only content is what it forbids. Simon’s point was that AtA_t is bounded by hours and by human processing capacity, and that this bound is not responsive to technology in the way that GtG_t is. If GtG_t rises by an order of magnitude, ϕt\phi_t falls by an order of magnitude unless…

Meanings in this article

  • AtA_t: the nothing pushes usefully on.
  • cvc_v: the historically pushed on.
  • ϕt\phi_t: the fraction.
  • GtG_t: the number of claims placed before some audience in period t , let AtA_t be that audience’s total attention budget, and let cvc_v be the average attention cost of verifying one claim.
Equation guide → · Article →