← Mathematical compendium

Published equation contexts

317×287=90,979317 \times 287 = 90{,}979

Why this formula appears here

The gap between the two naive strategies a trainer might reach for instead and this corner is not small. Dumping the entire budget into Attack alone (252 Attack, 0 Speed) yields a sweep index of 359 ×\times 264 = 94{,}776 ; splitting the 510-point budget evenly across all six stats (85 EVs each) yields Attack 317, Speed 287, and a sweep index of 317 ×\times 287 = 90{,}979 . The corner solution’s 359 ×\times 333 = 119{,}547 beats the first naive baseline by 26.1 percent and the second by 31.4 percent on this article’s own measure — a real, computed gap, not a rhetorical one.

Read the full article-specific guide →

How to interpret it

Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

Research cited beside this formula

Published contexts (1)

A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.

317×287=90,979317 \times 287 = 90{,}979

Equation 24 · Game-Mechanic Economics

The EV Formula Is an Exact Production Function Trainers Solved by Accident

This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions.

The gap between the two naive strategies a trainer might reach for instead and this corner is not small. Dumping the entire budget into Attack alone (252 Attack, 0 Speed) yields a sweep index of 359 ×\times 264 = 94{,}776 ; splitting the 510-point budget evenly across all six stats (85 EVs each) yields Attack 317, Speed 287, and a sweep index of 317 ×\times 287 = 90{,}979 . The corner solution’s 359 ×\times 333 = 119{,}547 beats the first naive baseline by 26.1 percent and the second by 31.4 percent on this article’s own measure — a real, computed gap, not a rhetorical one.

Equation guide → · Article →