← Mathematical compendium
Published equation contexts
2.9×1024
Why this formula appears here
A second, independent ceiling bounds not the rate of erasure but the total information a bounded system can hold at all: the Bekenstein bound limits the entropy of a system of effective size R and energy E to S≤ 2π kBRE/(ℏ c) [ 8 ] . For a processor of size R=1\,cm holding E=1\,J of available energy, this gives S≲27\,JK−1 , equivalent to roughly 2.9×10^{24} bits of maximum distinguishable entropy — a static capacity ceiling, not a rate. Erasing that many bits at 10\,mK would cost at least Qmin=ST≈0.27\,J , more than a quarter of the entire energy budget assumed available, entirely independent of any horizon.…
Read the full article-specific guide →
How to interpret it
Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.
Research cited beside this formula
Published contexts (1)
A symbol can carry a different meaning in another article. Each occurrence keeps its own guide and term definitions.
Equation 101 · Evolutionary Physics
This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text.
A second, independent ceiling bounds not the rate of erasure but the total information a bounded system can hold at all: the Bekenstein bound limits the entropy of a system of effective size R and energy E to S≤ 2π kBRE/(ℏ c) [ 8 ] . For a processor of size R=1\,cm holding E=1\,J of available energy, this gives S≲27\,JK−1 , equivalent to roughly 2.9×10^{24} bits of maximum distinguishable entropy — a static capacity ceiling, not a rate. Erasing that many bits at 10\,mK would cost at least Qmin=ST≈0.27\,J , more than a quarter of the entire energy budget assumed available, entirely independent of any horizon.…
Equation guide → ·
Article →