Equation 3 · Why Cost and Latency Belong in the Evaluation Score, Not a Footnote
What does this equation mean?
Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.
the expected latency. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.
Read it piece by piece
How to interpret it
Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.
What the article says around this equation
Treat a single evaluation run as producing a summary triple: a success indicator or rate s , an expected cost c , and an expected latency l . A leaderboard rank is a total order — every agent gets exactly one position — built by applying some function to that triple, almost always a function that looks only at s and discards c and l entirely, or folds them into a secondary table nobody reads before making a decision.
Sources cited in the article section
These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.
Return to Why Cost and Latency Belong in the Evaluation Score, Not a Footnote