← Back to article

Equation 1 · Who Builds 2100? The Demographic Engine of Technological Evolution

What does this equation mean?

gA=λn1−ϕg_A = \frac{\lambda n}{1-\phi}

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

Start withλ n
Divide by1-phi
This relates tog_A
How to read the two sides of this formula. Follow the article passage for the meaning of each quantity.

This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

gAg_A

Symbol g_A

the canonical form of the relationship.

Understand this part →

λ\lambda

Symbol λ

λ occurs above the fraction bar. The numerator is divided by the entire denominator below it.

Understand this part →

nn

Symbol n

n occurs above the fraction bar. The numerator is divided by the entire denominator below it.

Understand this part →

ϕ\phi

Symbol phi

phi occurs below the fraction bar. The quantity above the bar is divided by this expression; zero is excluded as a denominator.

Understand this part →

=

=

The expressions on both sides represent the same quantity under the stated assumptions.

Understand this part →

See an illustrated explanation →
fraction

fraction

Divide the expression above the line by the one below it.

Understand this part →

See an illustrated explanation →
subscript

subscript

The lower label selects a particular version, component, or indexed member of the quantity. For example, x₀ and xₜ can be values at different positions.

Understand this part →

λn\lambda n

Numerator: λ n

The complete quantity above the fraction bar.

Understand this part →

1−ϕ1-\phi

Denominator: 1-phi

The complete quantity below the fraction bar; it must be nonzero for this division.

Understand this part →

How to interpret it

With a fixed numerator, increasing a nonzero denominator reduces the fraction. Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

What the article says around this equation

Semi-endogenous growth theory, the framework Jones developed and that his 2022 Annual Review of Economics piece surveys, formalizes this into a relationship between population growth and the long-run growth rate of ideas [ 4 ] . Population enters the idea-production function as the stock of people available to search the technological fitness landscape for improvements, and because ideas are non-rival — one firm’s discovery of a better transistor layout does not use up the possibility for another firm to discover a different one — expanding that search population raises the rate of discovery roughly in proportion to its own growth, discounted by how much duplicated effort dilutes the return…
Read the full surrounding passage
Semi-endogenous growth theory, the framework Jones developed and that his 2022 Annual Review of Economics piece surveys, formalizes this into a relationship between population growth and the long-run growth rate of ideas [ 4 ] . Population enters the idea-production function as the stock of people available to search the technological fitness landscape for improvements, and because ideas are non-rival — one firm’s discovery of a better transistor layout does not use up the possibility for another firm to discover a different one — expanding that search population raises the rate of discovery roughly in proportion to its own growth, discounted by how much duplicated effort dilutes the return to any one searcher and by how much each new discovery makes the next one to find. The canonical form of the relationship is gA=λn1−ϕg_A = \frac{\lambda n}{1-\phi}. where n is the growth rate of the population of researchers, ϕ\phi measures how much easier or harder each new idea makes the next one to find (values below 1 are required for the model’s growth path to be stable at all — the discipline’s own name for this is diminishing returns to knowledge accumulation), and λ\lambda measures how much duplicated research effort — different teams stumbling onto the same idea — dilutes each additional researcher’s marginal contribution. The formula says something that should be intuitive from the fitness-landscape framing: if the population of people searching for new technology stops growing, n falls toward zero, and the long-run growth rate of ideas falls with it, one for one, unless something else changes λ\lambda or ϕ\phi .

Read the equation in its article →

Sources cited in the surrounding passage

These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.

Return to Who Builds 2100? The Demographic Engine of Technological Evolution

See this formula across 1 published context →

Browse the mathematical compendium →