← Back to article

Equation 9 · What RLHF Actually Optimises: Rated Agreeableness, and Where It Parts from Helpfulness

What does this equation mean?

RBoN(d)=d(αBoN−βBoNd)R_{\mathrm{BoN}}(d) = d(\alpha_{\mathrm{BoN}} - \beta_{\mathrm{BoN}} d)

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

Inputs and operationsd(alpha_BoN - beta_BoN d)
Result or conditionR_BoN(d)
How to read the two sides of this formula. Follow the article passage for the meaning of each quantity.

This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

RBoNR_{\mathrm{BoN}}

Symbol R_BoN

RBR_BoN is part of the quantity the equation computes from the expression on the right.

Understand this part →

dd

Symbol d

d is an argument of the function-like quantity on the left; its role is set by that function’s stated inputs.

Understand this part →

αBoN\alpha_{\mathrm{BoN}}

Symbol alpha_BoN

alphaBa_BoN is one of the signed contributions combined to compute the quantity on the left.

Understand this part →

βBoN\beta_{\mathrm{BoN}}

Symbol beta_BoN

betaBa_BoN is one of the signed contributions combined to compute the quantity on the left.

Understand this part →

=

=

The expressions on both sides represent the same quantity under the stated assumptions.

Understand this part →

See an illustrated explanation →
subtraction

subtraction

Subtract the following term or group from the preceding one. A leading minus marks a negative quantity.

Understand this part →

subscript

subscript

The lower label selects a particular version, component, or indexed member of the quantity. For example, x₀ and xₜ can be values at different positions.

Understand this part →

How to interpret it

Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

What the article says around this equation

Gao, Schulman and Hilton measured this cleanly by building a synthetic setting in which a large fixed “gold” reward model plays the role of the human, and a smaller “proxy” reward model is trained on its labels [ 8 ] . Optimising the proxy raises the gold score at first and then lowers it. They fit empirical functional forms in d , the square root of the KL divergence from the initial policy, finding for best-of- n sampling RBoN(d)R_{\mathrm{BoN}}(d) = d(αBoN\alpha_{\mathrm{BoN}} - βBoN\beta_{\mathrm{BoN}} d) and for reinforcement learning

Read the equation in its article →

Sources cited in the surrounding passage

These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.

Return to What RLHF Actually Optimises: Rated Agreeableness, and Where It Parts from Helpfulness

See this formula across 1 published context →

Browse the mathematical compendium →