← All parts of this equation

Equation 3 · Part 9 · What RLHF Actually Optimises: Rated Agreeableness, and Where It Parts from Helpfulness

Symbol gamma

E[rθ(x,y)]−β E[DKL ⁣(πRL ∥ πSFT)]+γ E[log⁡πRL(x)],\mathbb{E}\big[r_\theta(x,y)\big] - \beta\,\mathbb{E}\big[D_{\mathrm{KL}}\!\left(\pi^{\mathrm{RL}} \,\|\, \pi^{\mathrm{SFT}}\right)\big] + \gamma\,\mathbb{E}\big[\log \pi^{\mathrm{RL}}(x)\big],
γ\gamma

What this part means

the pretraining mixture.

Its job in the formula

gamma is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.

Where the article explains it

where β\beta sets the strength of the KL penalty and γ\gamma the pretraining mixture, with γ\gamma set to zero for the plain PPO models [ 4 ] .

The passage around this formula

…published objective adds a per-token KL penalty from the supervised model and, in the PPO-ptx variant, a term mixing in pretraining gradients: E[rθ(x,y)]−β E[DKL ⁣(πRL ∥ πSFT)]+γ E[log⁡πRL(x)]\mathbb{E}\big[r_\theta(x,y)\big] - \beta\,\mathbb{E}\big[D_{\mathrm{KL}}\!\left(\pi^{\mathrm{RL}} \,\|\, \pi^{\mathrm{SFT}}\right)\big] + \gamma\,\mathbb{E}\big[\log \pi^{\mathrm{RL}}(x)\big]. where β\beta sets the strength of the KL penalty and γ\gamma the pretraining mixture, with γ\gamma set to zero for the plain PPO models [ 4 ] . Direct preference optimisation later showed that the explicit reward model can be dispensed with entirely — the optimal policy under this objective has a closed form, so the same problem can be solved with a…

Read this part in the article →

Learn the underlying idea

A variable is a named place for a value. Its letter is a local label: x can mean position in one formula and a data point in another.

Open the illustrated variables: a letter stands for a value guide →

See this notation across published equations →

Sources cited in the surrounding passage

These citations provide research context; check each source for the exact claim it supports.