← Back to article

Equation 13 · The Token Tax of Giving a Model More Tools

What does this equation mean?

SmS_m

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

the shortlist shown to the model. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

SmS_m

Symbol S_m

the shortlist shown to the model.

Understand this part →

subscript

subscript

The lower label selects a particular version, component, or indexed member of the quantity. For example, x₀ and xₜ can be values at different positions.

Understand this part →

How to interpret it

Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

What the article says around this equation

A separate, applied study on enterprise agent routing gives a way to decompose exactly what breaks as a real tool catalogue scales, rather than only that something does. Scaling from 10 to 110 candidate agents or tools, the authors report routing F1 on under-specified requests dropping 16 to 23 percentage points across the models tested, and split that drop with an oracle analysis into two distinct components: a retrieval gap , the model’s failure to surface the correct tool at all, and a confusion gap , a roughly 10-percentage-point reduction in the theoretical best-case score that persists even when retrieval is assumed perfect [ 11 ] . Written as a decomposition of the error a shortlist…
Read the full surrounding passage
A separate, applied study on enterprise agent routing gives a way to decompose exactly what breaks as a real tool catalogue scales, rather than only that something does. Scaling from 10 to 110 candidate agents or tools, the authors report routing F1 on under-specified requests dropping 16 to 23 percentage points across the models tested, and split that drop with an oracle analysis into two distinct components: a retrieval gap , the model’s failure to surface the correct tool at all, and a confusion gap , a roughly 10-percentage-point reduction in the theoretical best-case score that persists even when retrieval is assumed perfect [ 11 ] . Written as a decomposition of the error a shortlist of size m drawn from a full catalogue of n tools produces, where tool⋆\mathrm{tool}^\star is the one the request actually calls for and SmS_m is the shortlist shown to the model:

Read the equation in its article →

Sources cited in the surrounding passage

These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.

Return to The Token Tax of Giving a Model More Tools

Browse the mathematical compendium →