← Back to article

Equation 5 · Seventy-Five Thousand Generations of E. coli, and Counting

What does this equation mean?

β\beta

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

β\beta

Symbol β

β is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.

Understand this part →

How to interpret it

Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

What the article says around this equation

for an exponent β\beta between 0 and 1, which keeps rising — more and more slowly, but without any asymptote — for every value of t . Wiser and colleagues derived the second form theoretically from a model combining clonal interference with diminishing-returns epistasis among beneficial mutations, and reported that across 50,000 generations of real data, “mean fitness appears to increase without bound, consistent with a power law” [ 2 ] . The decelerating rate that Lenski’s 1991 paper had already observed over the first 2,000 generations turns out to be compatible with no ceiling at all: a population’s fitness gains can keep shrinking, generation after generation, without the sum of those…
Read the full surrounding passage
for an exponent β\beta between 0 and 1, which keeps rising — more and more slowly, but without any asymptote — for every value of t . Wiser and colleagues derived the second form theoretically from a model combining clonal interference with diminishing-returns epistasis among beneficial mutations, and reported that across 50,000 generations of real data, “mean fitness appears to increase without bound, consistent with a power law” [ 2 ] . The decelerating rate that Lenski’s 1991 paper had already observed over the first 2,000 generations turns out to be compatible with no ceiling at all: a population’s fitness gains can keep shrinking, generation after generation, without the sum of those gains ever stopping. That is a specific, falsifiable claim about the shape of adaptation, not a synonym for “still improving.”

Read the equation in its article →

Sources cited in the surrounding passage

These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.

Return to Seventy-Five Thousand Generations of E. coli, and Counting

Browse the mathematical compendium →