← Back to article

Equation 5 · Selection Accounting: The Price Equation Runs the Economy

What does this equation mean?

dzˉdt∣selection=β Var⁡s(z)\frac{d\bar z}{dt}\Big|_{\text{selection}} = \beta \, \operatorname{Var}_s(z)

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

Inputs and operationsβ Var_s(z)
Result or conditionfracdbar zdtBig|_selection
How to read the two sides of this formula. Follow the article passage for the meaning of each quantity.

This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

dd

Symbol d

d is part of the quantity the equation computes from the expression on the right.

Understand this part →

zˉ\bar z

Symbol bar z

bar z occurs above the fraction bar. The numerator is divided by the entire denominator below it.

Understand this part →

tt

Symbol t

t occurs below the fraction bar. The quantity above the bar is divided by this expression; zero is excluded as a denominator.

Understand this part →

β\beta

Symbol β

never a constant of nature.

Understand this part →

ss

Symbol s

s is an input to the expression that computes the quantity on the left.

Understand this part →

zz

Symbol z

z occurs above the fraction bar. The numerator is divided by the entire denominator below it.

Understand this part →

=

=

The expressions on both sides represent the same quantity under the stated assumptions.

Understand this part →

See an illustrated explanation →
fraction

fraction

Divide the expression above the line by the one below it.

Understand this part →

See an illustrated explanation →
subscript

subscript

The lower label selects a particular version, component, or indexed member of the quantity. For example, x₀ and xₜ can be values at different positions.

Understand this part →

dzˉd\bar z

Numerator: dbar z

The complete quantity above the fraction bar.

Understand this part →

dtdt

Denominator: dt

The complete quantity below the fraction bar; it must be nonzero for this division.

Understand this part →

How to interpret it

With a fixed numerator, increasing a nonzero denominator reduces the fraction. Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

What the article says around this equation

Add one falsifiable assumption — that market share evolves under replicator dynamics with a linear selection gradient linking a firm’s productivity advantage to its realized share growth — and Proposition 2 states an economic reading of Fisher’s fundamental theorem of natural selection [ 2 ] : dzˉdt∣selection=β Var⁡s(z)\frac{d\bar z}{dt}\Big|_{\text{selection}} = \beta \, \operatorname{Var}_s(z). The selection component of the growth rate of mean log productivity equals a selection-intensity coefficient β\beta times the share-weighted variance of log productivity across firms. The qualitative move is not new: Metcalfe applied Fisher’s principle to competing firms under replicator dynamics in the 1990s [ 4 ] , and Andersen used Price’s equation itself, by name, to split…
Read the full surrounding passage
Add one falsifiable assumption — that market share evolves under replicator dynamics with a linear selection gradient linking a firm’s productivity advantage to its realized share growth — and Proposition 2 states an economic reading of Fisher’s fundamental theorem of natural selection [ 2 ] : dzˉdt∣selection=β Var⁡s(z)\frac{d\bar z}{dt}\Big|_{\text{selection}} = \beta \, \operatorname{Var}_s(z). The selection component of the growth rate of mean log productivity equals a selection-intensity coefficient β\beta times the share-weighted variance of log productivity across firms. The qualitative move is not new: Metcalfe applied Fisher’s principle to competing firms under replicator dynamics in the 1990s [ 4 ] , and Andersen used Price’s equation itself, by name, to split economic change into selection and innovation effects in 2004 [ 5 ] . What the paper adds is a discipline on β\beta : because realized market selection acts on profitability rather than on physical output alone, per Foster, Haltiwanger, and Syverson’s finding that price and physical productivity pull in opposite directions across surviving plants [ 14 ] , β\beta is never a constant of nature. It must be estimated market by market, and any estimate built on revenue-based productivity will confound genuine efficiency with market power. A third result, Proposition 3, iterates the same identity over nested levels of the economy and reads Hsieh and Klenow’s cross-country misallocation measurements [ 10 ] as a statement about which level is doing the selecting and which level has its selection suppressed — misallocation, on this reading, is not a residual but selection a higher level of aggregation is failing to let through. The persistence that scales β\beta into a real forecast is itself already measured: regressing a firm’s productivity on its own lagged value yields autoregressive coefficients on the order of 0.6 to 0.8 in the plant- and firm-level literature [ 9 ] , the direct economic analogue of the narrow-sense heritability that scales Fisher’s original biological theorem.

Read the equation in its article →

Sources cited in the surrounding passage

These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.

Return to Selection Accounting: The Price Equation Runs the Economy

See this formula across 1 published context →

Browse the mathematical compendium →