Equation 8 · Running an Interpretability Investigation That Holds Up
What does this equation mean?
Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.
This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.
Read it piece by piece
Symbol C
C is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.
How to interpret it
Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.
What the article says around this equation
The defence against this is a control condition run alongside the target one, not after it: intervene identically on a component set ' matched to the target set in size, depth and baseline activation statistics, but which the hypothesis explicitly predicts should have no effect, and compare
Sources cited in the article section
- [3] Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methods ↗
- [4] Causal Scrubbing: A Method for Rigorously Testing Interpretability Hypotheses ↗
- [5] Is This the Subspace You Are Looking for? An Interpretability Illusion for Subspace Activation Patching ↗
- [6] Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretability ↗
These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.
Return to Running an Interpretability Investigation That Holds Up