Equation 22 · Probing, Sparse Autoencoders, Patching, and Steering: The Main Interpretability Methods, Compared

What does this equation mean?

\mathcal C

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

C

Symbol C

copied from one run into the other.

Understand this part →

How to interpret it

Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

What the article says around this equation

where $m_{\text{clean}}$ and $m_{\text{corrupt}}$ are a chosen behavioural metric measured on the clean and corrupted runs, and $m_{\text{patch}}(\mathcal C)$ is that same metric after the activations of component set $\mathcal C$ are copied from one run into the other. A score near one means patching $\mathcal C$ alone restores nearly all of the clean behaviour; a score near zero means it restores almost none.

Read the equation in its article →

Sources cited in the article section

These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.

Return to Probing, Sparse Autoencoders, Patching, and Steering: The Main Interpretability Methods, Compared

See this formula across 4 published contexts →

Browse the mathematical compendium →