← Back to article

Equation 6 · Prepared Fears: How Evolution Biased What the Mind Learns to Dread

What does this equation mean?

VV

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

the current associative strength between a stimulus and an outcome. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

VV

Symbol V

the current associative strength between a stimulus and an outcome.

Understand this part →

How to interpret it

Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

What the article says around this equation

The reframing also fits what clinical treatment for phobia actually looks like, without needing an additional assumption. Exposure-based treatment works by driving V back down toward zero through repeated, non-reinforced exposure to the feared stimulus — a description that says nothing about α\alpha at all. If preparedness operates on the learning rate for acquisition rather than on some separate, treatment-resistant substrate, there is no particular reason a prepared association should be harder to unlearn once a patient is actually engaged in structured extinction; it need only have been easier to learn in the first place and, per McNally’s reading of the acquisition-side evidence, easier…
Read the full surrounding passage
The reframing also fits what clinical treatment for phobia actually looks like, without needing an additional assumption. Exposure-based treatment works by driving V back down toward zero through repeated, non-reinforced exposure to the feared stimulus — a description that says nothing about α\alpha at all. If preparedness operates on the learning rate for acquisition rather than on some separate, treatment-resistant substrate, there is no particular reason a prepared association should be harder to unlearn once a patient is actually engaged in structured extinction; it need only have been easier to learn in the first place and, per McNally’s reading of the acquisition-side evidence, easier to tell apart from irrelevant stimuli during that learning [ 13 ] . A dedicated, encapsulated module framed as impenetrable to cognitive control would predict something closer to a treatment-resistance specific to prepared categories, over and above ordinary extinction difficulty; nothing in the evidence reviewed here establishes that such a category-specific treatment resistance exists, which is itself a reason to prefer the more modest, single-mechanism account over the stronger one.

Read the equation in its article →

Sources cited in the surrounding passage

These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.

Return to Prepared Fears: How Evolution Biased What the Mind Learns to Dread

Browse the mathematical compendium →