Equation 5 · How AI Models Learned to Use Tools: A Protocol History
What does this equation mean?
Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.
the when. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.
Read it piece by piece
How to interpret it
Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.
What the article says around this equation
The assumption a shared protocol is betting on is that the fixed cost of building and maintaining the standard itself is smaller than the integrations it removes, and that those removed integrations were genuinely redundant rather than differently necessary. When M and N are both large and still growing, the gap between M N and M + N dominates every other consideration; when either is small — a single application talking to a handful of tools it controls — a bespoke integration can still be cheaper than adopting a shared protocol at all, and treating standardization as free in that case would be cargo-culting rather than economizing.
Sources cited in the article section
- [10] Introducing the Model Context Protocol ↗
- [11] Specification ↗
- [12] JSON-RPC 2.0 Specification ↗
- [13] Language Server Protocol ↗
These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.
Return to How AI Models Learned to Use Tools: A Protocol History