← Back to article

Equation 7 · From Origins to Frontier: A History of Particle Physics Beyond the Standard Model

What does this equation mean?

R(K∗)R(K^{*})

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

RR

Symbol R

R is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.

Understand this part →

K∗K^{*}

Symbol K^*

K∗K^* is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.

Understand this part →

superscript

superscript

A raised number can be a power. When it is a label or bound, it selects a case or the upper limit of a sum; the formula’s structure distinguishes these uses.

Understand this part →

See an illustrated explanation →

How to interpret it

Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

What the article says around this equation

Flavor physics produced the decade’s most closely watched near-misses. Between roughly 2014 and 2021, LHCb’s measurements of B -meson decays into muon pairs versus electron pairs — the “ R(K) ” and R(K∗K^{*}) ratios that the Standard Model predicts should equal one if the model’s lepton universality holds — showed persistent tensions with that prediction, at one point reaching a statistical significance of 3.1 standard deviations and drawing serious theoretical attention as a possible sign of new particles coupling differently to muons than to electrons [ 7 ] . In December 2022, an improved, higher-statistics LHCb analysis brought the measured ratios back into agreement with the Standard Model…
Read the full surrounding passage
Flavor physics produced the decade’s most closely watched near-misses. Between roughly 2014 and 2021, LHCb’s measurements of B -meson decays into muon pairs versus electron pairs — the “ R(K) ” and R(K∗K^{*}) ratios that the Standard Model predicts should equal one if the model’s lepton universality holds — showed persistent tensions with that prediction, at one point reaching a statistical significance of 3.1 standard deviations and drawing serious theoretical attention as a possible sign of new particles coupling differently to muons than to electrons [ 7 ] . In December 2022, an improved, higher-statistics LHCb analysis brought the measured ratios back into agreement with the Standard Model prediction [ 7 ] . The anomaly, as a statistical excess, is gone; what remains is a lesson about how this science actually proceeds — an intriguing few-sigma deviation generated years of theoretical model-building before more data resolved it in the Standard Model’s favor, and reporting that treated the early hints as an established discovery would have been simply wrong. This is a fact worth stating without hedging: the flavor anomalies as originally reported did not hold up.

Read the equation in its article →

Sources cited in the surrounding passage

These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.

Return to From Origins to Frontier: A History of Particle Physics Beyond the Standard Model

See this formula across 2 published contexts →

Browse the mathematical compendium →