Equation 2 · Ecological Rationality: When Biases Are Adaptations
What does this equation mean?
Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.
This mathematical expression combines the displayed quantities; its precise role follows from the surrounding article text. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.
Read it piece by piece
Symbol H
H is a part of this expression. Its role is fixed by the surrounding article and by the operations shown in the formula.
How to interpret it
Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.
What the article says around this equation
This is a rule about optimal thresholds, not merely an intuition, and it has a compact formal statement. A decision-maker observes ambiguous evidence D bearing on whether a state H holds — a predator is present, a partner is unfaithful, an approach signals romantic interest — against the alternative that it does not. Where is the fitness cost of a false alarm and is the fitness cost of a miss, the threshold that minimizes total expected fitness cost is to infer H whenever:
Sources cited in the article section
- [11] Error Management and the Evolution of Cognitive Bias ↗
- [10] Error Management Theory: A New Perspective on Biases in Cross-Sex Mind Reading ↗
- [12] The Evolution of Error: Error Management, Cognitive Constraints, and Adaptive Decision-Making Biases ↗
These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.
Return to Ecological Rationality: When Biases Are Adaptations